Freeman A I, Weinberg V, Brecher M L, Jones B, Glicksman A S, Sinks L F, Weil M, Pleuss H, Hananian J, Burgert E O, Gilchrist G S, Necheles T, Harris M, Kung F, Patterson R B, Maurer H, Leventhal B, Chevalier L, Forman E, Holland J F
N Engl J Med. 1983 Mar 3;308(9):477-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198303033080902.
We compared two regimens with respect to their ability to prolong disease-free survival in 506 children and adolescents with acute lymphocytic leukemia. All responders to induction therapy were randomized to treatment with 2400 rad of cranial irradiation plus intrathecal methotrexate or to treatment with intermediate-dose methotrexate plus intrathecal methotrexate, as prophylaxis for involvement of the central nervous system and other "sanctuary" areas. Patients were then treated with a standard maintenance regimen. Complete responders were stratified into either standard-risk or increased-risk groups on the basis of age and white-cell count at presentation. Among patients with standard risk, hematologic relapses occurred in 9 of 117 given methotrexate and 24 of 120 given irradiation (P less than 0.01). The rate of central-nervous-system relapse was higher in the methotrexate group (23 of 117) than in the irradiation group (8 of 120) (P = 0.01). Among patients with increased risk, radiation offered greater protection to the central nervous system than methotrexate (P = 0.03); there was no difference in the rate of hematologic relapse. In both risk strata the frequency of testicular relapse was significantly lower in the methotrexate group (1 patient) than the radiation group (10 patients) (P = 0.01). Methotrexate offered better protection against systemic relapse in standard-risk patients and better protection against testicular relapse overall, but it offered less protection against relapses in the central nervous system than cranial irradiation.
我们比较了两种治疗方案延长506例急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童和青少年无病生存期的能力。所有诱导治疗的缓解者被随机分为两组,一组接受2400拉德的颅脑照射加鞘内注射甲氨蝶呤,另一组接受中剂量甲氨蝶呤加鞘内注射甲氨蝶呤,作为中枢神经系统及其他“庇护”部位受累的预防措施。然后患者接受标准维持治疗方案。根据就诊时的年龄和白细胞计数,将完全缓解者分为标准风险组或高风险组。在标准风险患者中,接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的117例中有9例发生血液学复发,接受照射治疗的120例中有24例发生血液学复发(P<0.01)。甲氨蝶呤组中枢神经系统复发率(117例中的23例)高于照射组(120例中的8例)(P = 0.01)。在高风险患者中,放疗对中枢神经系统的保护作用大于甲氨蝶呤(P = 0.03);血液学复发率无差异。在两个风险分层中,甲氨蝶呤组(1例患者)睾丸复发频率均显著低于放疗组(10例患者)(P = 0.01)。甲氨蝶呤对标准风险患者的全身复发提供了更好的保护,总体上对睾丸复发提供了更好的保护,但对中枢神经系统复发的保护作用小于颅脑照射。