Niville E C, Himpens J M, Bruos P L, Gruwez J A
Injury. 1983 Nov;15(3):153-5. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(83)90002-5.
The choice of approach is still one of the most controversial points in the surgical treatment of recent rupture of the diaphragm. Most authors agree, however, about the use of thoracotomy in the late cases with strangulation. From 1970 to 1982 inclusive, 40 patients were operated on within a week of closed rupture of the diaphragm. The following data appear from these operations: 1. In 29 patients (73 per cent) one or more subdiaphragmatic organs needed repair. Only 4 patients (10 per cent) required operation for a thoracic lesion. 2. The hernia was easily repaired in the 34 cases treated by laparotomy only. For this reason when confronted by a recent diaphragmatic rupture, we almost always use an abdominal incision knowing that it, can easily be extended into the chest if this becomes necessary for the treatment of an injury there. In our experience, this policy needed to be changed in only a very few special cases.
在近期膈肌破裂的外科治疗中,手术入路的选择仍是最具争议的问题之一。然而,大多数作者对于在晚期绞窄性病例中采用开胸手术的观点是一致的。从1970年至1982年(含1982年),40例患者在膈肌闭合性破裂后一周内接受了手术。从这些手术中得出以下数据:1. 29例患者(73%)的一个或多个膈下器官需要修复。只有4例患者(10%)因胸部病变需要手术。2. 在仅接受剖腹手术治疗的34例病例中,疝很容易修复。因此,当面对近期的膈肌破裂时,我们几乎总是采用腹部切口,因为我们知道,如果为了治疗那里的损伤有必要,腹部切口可以很容易地延伸至胸部。根据我们的经验,仅在极少数特殊情况下才需要改变这一策略。