Rogowitz B E
Vision Res. 1983;23(10):1057-73. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90017-2.
A metacontrast masking paradigm is presented in which the detectability of a sine-wave target is measured in the presence of a spatially-flanking sine-wave mask. The onset of the mask either precedes (forward masking) or follows (backward masking) the onset of the target. Target detectability is measured as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) for stimuli varying in spatial frequency and contrast. For low spatial-frequency targets, target detectability varies as a U-shaped function of SOA both in forward and backward masking. For high spatial frequency targets, U-shaped masking is observed only in backward masking. The magnitude of the masking effect at each SOA of maximal masking (SOAmax) depends on the spatial-frequency similarity of target and mask. SOAmax does not vary with contrast, but does vary with spatial frequency. These data are considered within the context of a model positing inhibitory interactions between the responses of fast- and slow-responding spatial-frequency selective channels, where the latency to channel response increases with spatial frequency.
本文介绍了一种元对比掩蔽范式,其中在空间侧翼正弦波掩蔽存在的情况下测量正弦波目标的可检测性。掩蔽的起始要么先于(前向掩蔽)要么跟随(后向掩蔽)目标的起始。目标可检测性作为刺激起始异步(SOA)的函数进行测量,刺激在空间频率和对比度上有所变化。对于低空间频率目标,目标可检测性在向前和向后掩蔽中均作为SOA的U形函数而变化。对于高空间频率目标,仅在向后掩蔽中观察到U形掩蔽。在最大掩蔽的每个SOA(SOAmax)处的掩蔽效应大小取决于目标和掩蔽的空间频率相似性。SOAmax不随对比度变化,但随空间频率变化。这些数据在一个模型的背景下进行考虑,该模型假定快速和慢速响应的空间频率选择通道的响应之间存在抑制性相互作用,其中通道响应的潜伏期随空间频率增加。