Popovsky J, Edelstein J, Walzer L, Vlastou C, Ryan C
Ann Thorac Surg. 1978 Jul;26(1):50-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63630-2.
Twenty-five cases of extraluminal and 47 of intraluminal inferior vena caval (IVC) occlusion for management of pulmonary embolism were reviewed. A comparison of results obtained with both methods suggests that the IVC umbrella filter provides the safer, more reliable means of IVC interruption in patients whose condition fulfills the criteria for caval occlusion. The simplicity of this technique and the fact that it can be performed under local anesthesia justify its consideration as the procedure of choice for IVC occlusion and permit its use in severely ill patients. On the basis of our positive findings, we now recommend that extraluminal occlusion be reserved for patients in whom insertion of the IVC umbrella is technically impossible.
回顾了25例采用腔外法和47例采用腔内法闭塞下腔静脉(IVC)以治疗肺栓塞的病例。对两种方法所获结果的比较表明,对于病情符合腔静脉闭塞标准的患者,IVC伞形滤器是一种更安全、更可靠的下腔静脉阻断方法。该技术操作简便,且可在局部麻醉下进行,这证明将其视为下腔静脉闭塞的首选方法并允许在重症患者中使用是合理的。基于我们的阳性发现,我们现在建议,腔外闭塞仅适用于技术上无法插入IVC伞形滤器的患者。