A two-year study on the anthelmintic effect of a pregrazing treatment with the morantel sustained release bolus in first season grazing cattle in Sweden.

During two consecutive grazing seasons, the strategic use of the morantel sustained release bolus (MSRB) was monitored each year in first season grazing calves (maintained both years on the same pasture). The object of the study was to determine the effects of bolus treatment in young calves during successive years on the level of pasture larval contamination available at the beginning of the second year, and on the pattern of pasture recontamination that occurred during the second year. The level of worm burdens acquired in the trial animals at the end of the grazing season was determined both years. Tracer worm counts were determined during the first year of the study, while faecal worm egg counts, herbage larval counts and weight gain were monitored both years. During the first year (1979) the selected pasture was equally divided into three separate paddocks. Two paddocks were grazed by control calves, while each animal grazing the third paddock received a bolus at the time of turnout. During the second year (1980) three groups of calves were used. One group was treated with the bolus and grazed the same paddock as calves treated with the bolus the previous year. The second group was treated with the bolus and grazed the control paddock from the previous year, while the third group of calves remained nontreated and grazed the remaining paddock grazed by control calves from the previous year. As a result of the bolus treatment during the first year, the number of overwintering nematode larvae recovered the following spring was considerably lower than the number recorded on the paddock grazed previously by control animals. Worm counts and efficacy calculations demonstrated that worm burdens accumulated during the season were considerably lower in the bolus treated cattle during the second year than during the first. These parasitological differences were reflected in the weight gain comparisons between the treated and control cattle. Although significantly improved weight gains were recorded for both groups of treated cattle compared with the control cattle during the second year, the treated cattle grazing the treated paddock had a greater improvement than the treated cattle grazing the control paddock from the previous year.