• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿对属性和维度的理解:概念性与语言测量方法的比较

Young children's understanding of attributes and dimensions: a comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures.

作者信息

Smith L B

出版信息

Child Dev. 1984 Apr;55(2):363-80.

PMID:6723441
Abstract

Preschoolers' (2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds) understanding of attributes and dimensions was examined in 3 experiments. Attribute knowledge is the knowledge that a particular attribute--for example, red--can be instantiated in a variety of distinct objects. Dimension knowledge is the knowledge that there are qualitatively distinct kinds of attributes; for example, red and blue are attributes of the same kind, a kind that is different from that of big. Preschoolers' understanding of attributes and dimensions was assessed by both a conceptual measure and a linguistic measure. A language-free follow-the-leader task served as the conceptual measure. In this task, all the children showed strong attribute knowledge. However, 2-year-olds did not appear to differentiate attributes into their dimensional kinds. The observed trend in the linguistic task was not isomorphic to that observed in the conceptual task. The acquisition of some attribute and dimension labels appears to follow closely the trend in conceptual development, whereas the acquisition of others (specifically, size-attribute labels) lags severely behind the attainment of the basic concepts. The results provide new information about the development of object comparison and the acquisition of dimensional terms.

摘要

在3项实验中,研究了学龄前儿童(2岁、3岁和4岁)对属性和维度的理解。属性知识是指特定属性(例如红色)可以在各种不同的物体中体现出来的知识。维度知识是指存在质的不同类型的属性的知识;例如,红色和蓝色是同一种属性,与大这种属性不同。通过概念测量和语言测量来评估学龄前儿童对属性和维度的理解。一项无语言的模仿任务用作概念测量。在这项任务中,所有儿童都表现出很强的属性知识。然而,2岁儿童似乎没有将属性区分为不同的维度类型。在语言任务中观察到的趋势与在概念任务中观察到的趋势并不一致。一些属性和维度标签的习得似乎紧密跟随概念发展的趋势,而其他一些(特别是大小属性标签)的习得则严重滞后于基本概念的掌握。研究结果为物体比较的发展和维度术语的习得提供了新的信息。

相似文献

1
Young children's understanding of attributes and dimensions: a comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures.幼儿对属性和维度的理解:概念性与语言测量方法的比较
Child Dev. 1984 Apr;55(2):363-80.
2
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
3
The relation between children's conceptual functioning with color and color term acquisition.儿童颜色概念功能与颜色词习得之间的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Aug;94(4):301-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
4
Red bluebirds and black greenflies: preschoolers' understanding of the semantics of adjectives and count nouns.红色知更鸟和黑色蚜虫:学龄前儿童对形容词和可数名词语义的理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Nov;67(2):236-67. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1997.2404.
5
What makes a vibble a vibble? A developmental study of category generalization.是什么让一个“vibble”成为“vibble”?类别泛化的发展性研究。
Child Dev. 1989 Feb;60(1):214-24.
6
Priorities in children's expectations about object label reference: form over color.儿童对物体标签指代的期望优先级:形状优于颜色。
Child Dev. 1989 Dec;60(6):1291-306.
7
Conceptualization of perceptual attributes: a special case for color?感知属性的概念化:颜色的特殊情况?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Nov;80(3):289-314. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2001.2634.
8
Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents.形容词习得中的组合性与统计规律:4岁儿童根据新名词所指对象的大小分布来理解“高”和“矮”。
Child Dev. 2008 May-Jun;79(3):594-608. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01145.x.
9
Three-year-olds' problems with false belief: conceptual deficit or linguistic artifact?三岁儿童在错误信念方面的问题:概念缺陷还是语言假象?
Child Dev. 1990 Oct;61(5):1514-9.
10
Reflections on how color term acquisition is constrained.关于颜色术语习得如何受到限制的思考。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Aug;94(4):328-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.02.004.

引用本文的文献

1
The Shape Bias is Affected by Differing Similarity Among Objects.形状偏差受物体间不同相似度的影响。
Cogn Dev. 2012 Jan;27(1):28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.09.009.
2
A case for restricted-domain relational learning.一种受限领域关系学习的案例。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):907-13. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.907.
3
Children's Numerical Equivalence Judgments: Crossmapping Effects.儿童的数字等价判断:交叉映射效应。
Cogn Dev. 2008 Jan 1;23(1):191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.03.001.