Ebihara A, Kondo K, Ohashi K, Kosaka K, Kuzuya T, Tarui S
Diabetes Care. 1982 Nov-Dec;5 Suppl 2:35-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.5.2.s35.
The serum insulin, fractional absorption, serum human C-peptide, and plasma glucose responses of normal fasting subjects were compared after the subcutaneous and intravenous administration of human insulin (recombinant DNA) and Novo Actrapid insulin. While no statistical difference at each time point was observed between the two insulins, for each time point after 0.05 and 0.1 U/kg s.c., the 0-6 h area under curve (AUC) after the 0.05 U/kg dose was greater for human insulin than for pork insulin. There was no difference in the 0-6 h AUC after the 0.1 U/kg s.c. dose. The serum human C-peptide responses to the two insulins were virtually identical. With the 0.05 U/kg s.c. dose, hypoglycemic effect of human insulin was greater than for Actrapid. This difference did not occur after 0.1 U/kg s.c. Following intravenous administration using 0.05 U/kg, the serum IRI, serum C-peptide, and glucose responses were the same. These data indicate only slight differences between human insulin and Actrapid insulin.
对正常空腹受试者皮下和静脉注射人胰岛素(重组DNA)和诺和灵速效胰岛素后,比较其血清胰岛素、吸收分数、血清人C肽和血浆葡萄糖反应。虽然两种胰岛素在每个时间点均未观察到统计学差异,但在皮下注射0.05和0.1U/kg后,对于每个时间点,0.05U/kg剂量的人胰岛素0-6小时曲线下面积(AUC)大于猪胰岛素。皮下注射0.1U/kg剂量后,0-6小时AUC无差异。两种胰岛素的血清人C肽反应几乎相同。皮下注射0.05U/kg剂量时,人胰岛素的降糖作用大于诺和灵速效胰岛素。皮下注射0.1U/kg后未出现这种差异。静脉注射0.05U/kg后,血清IRI、血清C肽和葡萄糖反应相同。这些数据表明人胰岛素和诺和灵速效胰岛素之间仅有细微差异。