Granato P A, Schneible-Smith C, Weiner L B
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):963-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.963-968.1981.
New York City (NYC) and Martin-Lewis (ML) media were evaluated comparatively for their ability to support the growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from clinical specimens. A total of 1,010 urethral, cervical, pharyngeal, and rectal specimens were collected from walk-in patients attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. A total of 187 and 165 isolates of gonococci were cultivated on NYC and ML media, respectively, with 161 of these isolates being recovered on both media. Overall, the use of NYC medium resulted in a 13.3% increased recovery rate of gonococci. When gonococci were recovered on both media from primary isolation, the NYC medium supported a more luxuriant growth and a greater number of colonies, which usually resulted in the detection of positive cultures 1 day sooner than on ML medium. Both media were comparable in their ability to suppress the growth of saprophytic microorganisms. The results of this study demonstrated that the use of NYC medium markedly enhanced the recovery of N. gonorrhoeae from clinical specimens as compared to ML medium.
对纽约市(NYC)培养基和马丁-刘易斯(ML)培养基支持从临床标本中培养淋病奈瑟菌的能力进行了比较评估。从一家性传播疾病诊所的门诊患者中总共采集了1010份尿道、宫颈、咽部和直肠标本。分别在NYC培养基和ML培养基上培养出了总共187株和165株淋病奈瑟菌分离株,其中161株分离株在两种培养基上均能生长。总体而言,使用NYC培养基使淋病奈瑟菌的回收率提高了13.3%。当从初次分离中在两种培养基上均培养出淋病奈瑟菌时,NYC培养基支持更繁茂的生长和更多的菌落,这通常导致阳性培养物的检测比在ML培养基上早1天。两种培养基在抑制腐生微生物生长的能力方面相当。这项研究的结果表明,与ML培养基相比,使用NYC培养基显著提高了从临床标本中分离淋病奈瑟菌的回收率。