Suppr超能文献

评估峰值频率比(PFR)测量在内颈动脉狭窄检测中的应用。

Evaluation of the peak frequency ratio (PFR) measurement in the detection of internal carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Keagy B A, Pharr W F, Thomas D, Bowles D E

出版信息

J Clin Ultrasound. 1982 Mar;10(3):109-12. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870100304.

Abstract

The peak frequency ratio (PFR) between the internal carotid and common carotid artery Fast Fourier Transform Spectral Analysis patterns has been used to identify patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. To evaluate further the accuracy of the PFR, we applied it to the spectral analysis data from 396 vessels whose sound signals were obtained with a Duplex scanner (pulsed Doppler) and 246 arteries whose audible flow data were generated by a continuous-wave Doppler. The pulse Doppler with spectral analysis (PD/SA) correctly identified 221/254 (87%) of the vessels with less than 50% angiographic stenosis, 81/100 (81%) of the arteries with 50-99% stenosis, and 35/42 (83%) of the totally occluded internal carotid vessels for an overall accuracy of 85%. The continuous-wave Doppler with spectral analysis (CW/SA) did well in two categories but had an unacceptably high 47% false-negative rate for arteries with 50-99% stenosis. The PFR when applied to PD/SA test results is a useful parameter in screening patients with suspected internal carotid artery stenosis.

摘要

颈内动脉与颈总动脉快速傅里叶变换频谱分析模式之间的峰值频率比(PFR)已被用于识别颈内动脉狭窄患者。为了进一步评估PFR的准确性,我们将其应用于396条血管的频谱分析数据,这些血管的声音信号是通过双功扫描仪(脉冲多普勒)获得的,以及246条动脉的频谱分析数据,这些动脉的可听血流数据是由连续波多普勒产生的。带有频谱分析的脉冲多普勒(PD/SA)正确识别出血管造影狭窄小于50%的血管中有221/254(87%),50-99%狭窄的动脉中有81/100(81%),以及颈内动脉完全闭塞的血管中有35/42(83%),总体准确率为85%。带有频谱分析的连续波多普勒(CW/SA)在两类情况中表现良好,但对于50-99%狭窄的动脉,其假阴性率高达47%,令人无法接受。当将PFR应用于PD/SA测试结果时,它是筛查疑似颈内动脉狭窄患者的一个有用参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验