Suppr超能文献

比较分类方法:费用、住院时间和死亡率变化的测量。

Comparing classification methods: measurement of variations in charges, length of stay, and mortality.

作者信息

Horn S D, Schumacher D N

出版信息

Med Care. 1982 May;20(5):489-500. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198205000-00005.

Abstract

We define and examine three alternative systems for categorizing hospital patients. The first system is based on discharge abstract data alone; the second system is based on discharge abstract data that has been reabstracted from charts for completeness and accuracy; the third system is based on a severity-of-illness index within a diagnostic group. Using acute myocardial infarction patients as an illustrative example, we examine the homogeneity of these categorization systems with respect to charges, length of stay and mortality rates. Our results indicate that a measure of patient severity of illness is essential to produce homogeneous categories to study hospital productivity for utilization review assessment by PSROs, for planning purposes by Health Systems Agencies, for hospital rate setting by cost review commissions and for internal hospital financial management and utilization review studies.

摘要

我们定义并研究了三种对医院患者进行分类的替代系统。第一种系统仅基于出院摘要数据;第二种系统基于为保证完整性和准确性而从病历中重新提取的出院摘要数据;第三种系统基于诊断组内的疾病严重程度指数。以急性心肌梗死患者为例,我们考察了这些分类系统在费用、住院时长和死亡率方面的同质性。我们的结果表明,对于患者疾病严重程度的衡量对于生成同质类别至关重要,这些类别可用于专业标准审查组织(PSROs)进行利用审查评估以研究医院生产率、用于卫生系统机构进行规划、用于成本审查委员会确定医院费率以及用于医院内部财务管理和利用审查研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验