Ellen P, Mokohon L, Richardson W K
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1978 Jun;92(3):511-21. doi: 10.1037/h0077483.
The effectiveness of the differential reinforcement for low rates of responding (DRL) contingency in suppressing response rates of septal rats was investigated by using a Multi-DRL-yoked-VI (variable interval) schedule of reinforcement. The yoking procedure equated the interreinforcement times on the two schedules. Each schedule was in effect for half of each session, and the change in schedule was signaled by the presence or absence of a cue light. Schedule order and DRL delay requirement were varied. For both normal and septal rats, the response rates were higher in the VI component than the DRL component; this effect demonstrates that the responding of septals as well as normals is suppressed by the differential reinforcement of a particular class of IRTs. A sharp difference in the level of responding occurred at the point of transition from one component of the multiple schedule to the other, which provides evidence of a discrimination between the two schedules for both normals and septals. The conclusion is that the responding of septals is suppressed by the DRL contingency and not controlled solely by the density and distribution of reinforcement.
采用多DRL-配对可变间隔(VI)强化程序,研究了低反应率差别强化(DRL)条件作用对抑制隔区大鼠反应率的有效性。配对程序使两种程序的强化间隔时间相等。每个程序在每个实验时段的一半时间内有效,程序的变化由提示灯的亮灭来表示。程序顺序和DRL延迟要求有所不同。对于正常大鼠和隔区大鼠,VI部分的反应率均高于DRL部分;这一效应表明,特定类别的IRT的差别强化抑制了隔区大鼠和正常大鼠的反应。在多重程序的一个部分向另一个部分转换时,反应水平出现了明显差异,这为正常大鼠和隔区大鼠对两种程序的辨别提供了证据。结论是,DRL条件作用抑制了隔区大鼠的反应,而不仅仅受强化的密度和分布控制。