Giardina E G, Bigger J T, Glassman A H, Perel J M, Saroff A L, Roose S P, Siris S G, Davis J C
Int J Cardiol. 1983;2(3-4):375-89. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(83)90009-8.
Sixteen severely depressed patients participated in a double-blind randomized, crossover study to compare the effects of desmethylimipramine and imipramine on left ventricular function and the electrocardiogram. Following a drug-free week, patients had 3 weeks of therapy each with desmethylimipramine and imipramine. During each treatment period systolic time intervals, echocardiograms and high-fidelity electrocardiograms were recorded. There was no difference between desmethylimipramine and imipramine on (1) systolic time intervals, (2) shortening fraction or mean velocity of circumferential shortening, or (3) the electrocardiogram. There was a difference between the drug-free period and desmethylimipramine or imipramine on the PEPc (P less than 0.05) and the PEP/LVET ratio (P less than 0.05); on the R-R (P less than 0.05), PR (P less than 0.05), QRS (P less than 0.05), and QTc (P less than 0.05) intervals; but no difference on the LVETc or shortening fraction or the mean velocity of circumferential shortening. Drugs such as desmethylimipramine and imipramine which prolong intraventricular conduction can probably be expected to prolong the PEP and PEP/LVET. For this reason systolic time intervals have limitations in assessing myocardial function and the echocardiogram more reliably estimates myocardial performance in patients receiving tricyclic antidepressants.
16名重度抑郁症患者参与了一项双盲随机交叉研究,以比较去甲丙咪嗪和丙咪嗪对左心室功能及心电图的影响。在为期一周的停药期后,患者分别接受了3周的去甲丙咪嗪和丙咪嗪治疗。在每个治疗阶段,均记录了收缩期时间间期、超声心动图和高保真心电图。去甲丙咪嗪和丙咪嗪在以下方面无差异:(1)收缩期时间间期;(2)缩短分数或圆周缩短平均速度;(3)心电图。停药期与去甲丙咪嗪或丙咪嗪在PEPc(P<0.05)和PEP/LVET比值(P<0.05)方面存在差异;在R-R(P<0.05)、PR(P<0.05)、QRS(P<0.05)和QTc(P<0.05)间期方面也存在差异;但在LVETc、缩短分数或圆周缩短平均速度方面无差异。像去甲丙咪嗪和丙咪嗪这类延长室内传导的药物,可能会延长PEP和PEP/LVET。因此,收缩期时间间期在评估心肌功能方面存在局限性,而超声心动图能更可靠地评估接受三环类抗抑郁药治疗患者的心肌性能。