Cohen C I, Sokolovsky J
J Gerontol. 1983 Jan;38(1):81-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.1.81.
New York City homeless aged men living on the Bowery and in single-room occupancy hotels were contrasted using Bogue's model of skid row social formation. Because of their commonality of being unattached urban males, it had been assumed that they would exhibit similar characteristics and modes of adaptation. It is shown that homelessness is not a uniform category, nor can these men always be easily distinguished from the general populace. Only sociability criteria differentiated these men as a group from their nonhomeless age peers suggesting the appropriateness of an interactive conceptual framework for homelessness. Regression analysis revealed that three of Bogue's four criteria differentiated between Bowery and single-room occupancy men, with the socioeconomic being the most powerful data set. There were also important differences in the way each group handled their social world. The ability of these men to adapt to other environments is discussed.
运用博古的贫民窟社会形成模型,对生活在鲍厄里街及单人房入住酒店的纽约市无家可归老年男性进行了对比。由于他们同为无依无靠的城市男性,人们曾认为他们会表现出相似的特征和适应方式。研究表明,无家可归并非一个统一的类别,这些男性也并非总能轻易与普通民众区分开来。只有社交标准将这些男性作为一个群体与非无家可归的同龄人区分开来,这表明互动式无家可归概念框架是恰当的。回归分析显示,博古的四个标准中有三个能够区分鲍厄里街的男性和单人房入住酒店的男性,其中社会经济因素是最具影响力的数据集。两组男性处理其社交世界的方式也存在重要差异。文中还讨论了这些男性适应其他环境的能力。