Eagle K A, Black H R
Yale J Biol Med. 1983 Jan-Feb;56(1):1-8.
We reviewed the charts of 100 patients admitted to the hospital for evaluation of syncope. The charts were examined with special attention given to the causes of syncope, the frequency and benefit of diagnostic tests, and the relative cost of these tests. In 39 patients no etiology for syncope was found, and another 18 were felt to have had a vasovagal episode. Twelve patients had arrhythmias as the cause for syncope. Most of the patients underwent a variety of diagnostic tests including cardiac enzyme determinations, brain scans, electroencephalograms, head CAT scans, and Holter monitoring. In most instances, these tests added little useful information to the initial history and physical exam and were done at great expense to the patient. Our data suggest that extensive neurologic testing in patients with "routine" syncope is not warranted and that the focus of hospitalization should be to rule out potentially life-threatening arrhythmias.
我们查阅了100名因晕厥入院接受评估的患者病历。检查病历过程中,特别关注了晕厥的病因、诊断测试的频率和益处,以及这些测试的相对成本。39名患者未发现晕厥病因,另有18名被认为是血管迷走性发作。12名患者因心律失常导致晕厥。大多数患者接受了各种诊断测试,包括心肌酶测定、脑部扫描、脑电图、头部计算机断层扫描和动态心电图监测。在大多数情况下,这些测试并没有为最初的病史和体格检查增加多少有用信息,而且患者为此付出了高昂代价。我们的数据表明,对于“常规”晕厥患者,无需进行广泛的神经学检查,住院治疗的重点应是排除潜在的危及生命的心律失常。