Mileman P, Purdell-Lewis D, van der Weele L
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;10(6):329-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1982.tb00404.x.
Twelve duplicated bitewing radiographs of clinical quality were viewed under controlled conditions by 42 dentists in a teaching department. The dentists noted surfaces with initial caries or with caries in need of treatment. The radiographs were rediagnosed by 20% of the dentists to determine inter- and intra examiner reliability. A norm for the validity of lesion presence in enamel or dentin was applied. The variation in surfaces indicated for treatment is illustrated by: mean 40, s.d. 16, min. 13 and max. 89 for the 42. The mean proportion of true positive filling decisions in percentages was 67, s.d. 18, the mean proportion of false positive filling decisions was 22, s.d. 22. A large individual variation was found in this study. The dental teachers saw less caries present than the norm but some indicated more fillings needed than dentin caries present. It is suggested that care in the educational process should be given to developing appropriate caries treatment criteria. Factors conducive to preventively orientated treatment decisions in the clinical situation need further attention.
42名教学医院的牙医在可控条件下查看了12张具有临床质量的重复咬合翼片X光片。牙医们记录了存在初始龋齿或需要治疗的龋齿的表面。20%的牙医对X光片进行了重新诊断,以确定检查者之间和检查者内部的可靠性。应用了牙釉质或牙本质中病变存在有效性的标准。42名牙医中,建议治疗的表面变化情况如下:平均值为40,标准差为16,最小值为13,最大值为89。真正阳性充填决策的平均比例为67%,标准差为18;假阳性充填决策的平均比例为22%,标准差为22。本研究发现个体差异很大。牙科教师发现的龋齿比标准少,但一些人建议需要充填的牙齿比存在的牙本质龋齿多。建议在教育过程中注意制定适当的龋齿治疗标准。在临床情况下有助于做出预防性治疗决策的因素需要进一步关注。