Aronen H J, Suoranta H T, Taavitsainen M J
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981 Dec;137(6):1179-82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.137.6.1179.
Thermography, a fast, simple, and sensitive method, was compared with conventional contrast medium phlebography in the diagnosis of acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities in 141 patients. In 84% of the cases, the results with both techniques agreed. Thermograms showed the pathologic findings in 38 of 41 cases with deep thrombosis. In the three cases with false-negative findings, only the anterior surfaces of the legs were studied. In 19 cases, pathologic thermograms were recorded in the absence of deep thrombosis; the main reasons for findings were posttraumatic, postoperative, and postthrombotic states, and insufficiency of the perforant veins. If a patient has no previous history of a venous or other intervening disease, thermography with a negative finding excludes deep venous thrombosis. If it is used as a primary method, it can replace many phlebographies in the diagnosis of acute deep venous thrombosis.
热成像技术是一种快速、简单且灵敏的方法，在141例下肢急性深静脉血栓形成的诊断中，将其与传统的造影剂静脉造影术进行了比较。在84%的病例中，两种技术的结果一致。热像图显示41例深静脉血栓形成病例中有38例存在病理表现。在3例假阴性结果的病例中，仅对腿部前表面进行了研究。在19例病例中，在无深静脉血栓形成的情况下记录到了病理性热像图；出现这些结果的主要原因是创伤后、术后和血栓形成后的状态以及穿通静脉功能不全。如果患者既往没有静脉或其他介入性疾病史，热成像检查结果为阴性可排除深静脉血栓形成。如果将其作为主要方法，在急性深静脉血栓形成的诊断中它可以替代许多静脉造影检查。
