Radell B L, Cassingham R J
J Periodontol. 1980 Feb;51(2):110-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.1980.51.2.110.
Five patients received a Proplast implant in combination two- and three-wall osseous defects. In four of the cases the implant material was removed within 6 weeks due to failure to maintain primary closure over the Proplast and subsequent inflammation. One implant remained in place for 6 months with no apparent visual signs of inflammation. However, an 8 mm pocket remained, the area was reentered, and histologic sections made. The histologic sections revealed Proplast intermixed with bone, and the presence of foreign body giant cells.
五名患者在两壁和三壁骨缺损处联合植入了Proplast。在其中4例中,由于无法维持Proplast上方的一期缝合以及随后出现炎症,植入材料在6周内被取出。1枚植入物留存了6个月,没有明显的炎症迹象。然而,仍存在一个8毫米的牙周袋,于是再次进入该区域并制作了组织学切片。组织学切片显示Proplast与骨混合,并有异物巨细胞存在。