Suppr超能文献

[接骨材料的细菌污染。无菌手术间与传统手术室的比较]

[Bacterial contamination of osteosynthesis material. Comparison between a sterile compartment and the conventional operating room].

作者信息

Rothe H U, Burwinkel B

出版信息

Chirurg. 1982 Jan;53(1):51-4.

PMID:7037328
Abstract

This study compares two groups of patients who underwent osteosynthetic operations. The operations of one group were performed in an ultrasterile operating cubicle under laminar flow conditions, those of the other group in a conventional operating theatre. The results of smear tests show that not only the number of bacteria in explants, but also the number of postoperative wound infections was considerably lower in the laminar flow group. During a 4-year observation period, the most frequently isolated organism in 392 explants was staphylococcus aureus, in some cases with additional bacteria. Infection was present only in those cases in which bacteria were detected. The age of the patients, the length of time the explants were stored and the composition of the operating team were all insignificant with regard to the bacterial flora of the extracts. Only the level of sterility in the operating theatre (ultrasterile operating cubicle) at the moment of implantation was of recordable importance.

摘要

本研究比较了两组接受骨合成手术的患者。一组手术在层流条件下的超无菌手术间进行,另一组在传统手术室进行。涂片检查结果表明,不仅植入物中的细菌数量,而且层流组术后伤口感染的数量也显著更低。在4年的观察期内,392份植入物中最常分离出的微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌,在某些情况下还伴有其他细菌。仅在检测到细菌的病例中存在感染。患者的年龄、植入物储存的时间长度以及手术团队的组成,对于提取物中的细菌菌群而言均无显著影响。只有植入时手术室(超无菌手术间)的无菌水平具有可记录的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验