Gilbert A N
J Homosex. 1980;6(1-2):57-68. doi: 10.1300/j082v06n01_06.
This essay explores recent attempts to write the history of homosexuality and identifies two distinct approaches: the biographical approach, which reports on the private lives of individuals and charts the formation of homosexual subcultures; and the approach that studies the labeling and treatment of homosexual men and women by the heterosexual majority and examines the reasons why hatred of homosexuality increases and decreases over time. The author warns against applying modern definitions to words that have had different connotations. An an example of the possible confusion, the author discusses the two meanings of the work sodomy: unspecified sexual relations between males; and the act of anal intercourse, whether heterosexual or homosexual. Western civilization's association of the anus with evil, the devil, and bestiality is examined.
本文探讨了近期撰写同性恋史的尝试,并确定了两种不同的方法:传记法,即记述个人的私人生活并描绘同性恋亚文化的形成;以及研究异性恋多数群体对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的标签化及对待方式,并探究对同性恋的憎恶随时间增减的原因的方法。作者告诫不要将现代定义应用于具有不同内涵的词汇。作为可能产生混淆的一个例子,作者讨论了“鸡奸”一词的两种含义:男性之间未明确的性关系;以及肛交行为,无论异性恋或同性恋。文中考察了西方文明中肛门与邪恶、魔鬼及兽性的关联。