Suppr超能文献

腹侧被盖区损伤的大鼠在空板上的搜索策略受损:思维障碍测试的动物模型。

Search strategies on a hole-board are impaired in rats with ventral tegmental damage: animal model for tests of thought disorder.

作者信息

Oades R D

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1982 Feb;17(2):243-58.

PMID:7074182
Abstract

An ability to distinguish relevance from irrelevance has been attributed to an attention-related mechanism and may be disturbed in thought-disordered schizophrenics. Stimulus choice strategies depend on such mechanisms (ia) and are anomalous in some schizophrenics. An impaired function of the ventral tegmentum (VTA) has been postulated for schizophrenia. The effects of VTA damage on the relevance/irrelevance distinction and strategy formation in rats has been studied. Over a 5 day-period food-deprived rats were given nine sessions of ten trials each on a 16-hole board. They searched for food pellets placed consistently in four holes. During testing the control group (C) reduced the number of empty holes visited more than the group with VTA damage. The proportion of repeated visits to relevant holes (had food) to irrelevant holes (never had food) increased for the C but not for the VTA group. The frequency with which a preferred sequence of food-hole visits was repeated during a session increased over sessions for the C but not the VTA group. The VTA group changed their preference between sessions more often. Animals with VTA damage were capable of simple learning, but were impaired when complexity increased. This may be due in part to a deficit in attention-related mechanisms. This encourages further study of the contribution of the VTA to putative attentional dysfunction and the use of the hole-board search task as a model for the study of cognitive function and dysfunction.

摘要

区分相关性与不相关性的能力被归因于一种与注意力相关的机制,并且在思维紊乱的精神分裂症患者中可能会受到干扰。刺激选择策略依赖于这种机制(如前所述),并且在一些精神分裂症患者中是异常的。腹侧被盖区(VTA)功能受损被认为与精神分裂症有关。研究了VTA损伤对大鼠相关性/不相关性区分及策略形成的影响。在5天的时间里,对食物被剥夺的大鼠在一个16孔板上进行了9组实验,每组10次试验。它们寻找始终放置在四个孔中的食物颗粒。在测试过程中,对照组(C)比VTA损伤组更多地减少了访问的空孔数量。C组对相关孔(有食物)与不相关孔(从未有食物)的重复访问比例增加,而VTA组则没有。C组在一个实验过程中重复偏好的食物孔访问顺序的频率随着实验次数增加,而VTA组则没有。VTA组在不同实验之间更频繁地改变其偏好。VTA损伤的动物能够进行简单学习,但当复杂性增加时会受损。这可能部分归因于与注意力相关机制的缺陷。这鼓励进一步研究VTA对假定的注意力功能障碍的贡献,以及使用孔板搜索任务作为研究认知功能和功能障碍的模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验