Grieve R
Am J Ment Defic. 1982 Sep;87(2):180-5.
Mentally retarded children were asked to make various types of comparisons between sets and subsets of objects. Results showed that they succeeded when the comparison involved numerically unequal subsets of objects within the same set. When sets, or subsets, were numerically equal, the children clearly failed; instead of rejecting both alternatives in the comparison question, they selected one. With other comparisons, within and between sets and subsets of objects, the children guessed at an answer, and there was a tendency to answer in accordance with the most recently uttered part of the comparison question. These results indicate that although retarded children are thoroughly acquainted with certain aspects of language and its use in the process of comparison, other important aspects have yet to be learned.
研究人员要求智障儿童对物体集合及其子集进行各种类型的比较。结果显示,当比较涉及同一集合中数量不等的物体子集时,他们能够成功完成。当集合或子集数量相等时,儿童明显表现不佳;在比较问题中,他们不是拒绝两个选项,而是选择其一。在对物体集合及其子集进行的其他比较中,儿童会猜测答案,并且有一种倾向,即根据比较问题中最近说出的部分来回答。这些结果表明,虽然智障儿童在比较过程中对语言的某些方面及其使用有充分的了解,但其他重要方面仍有待学习。