Pearson R W, Triplett D A
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Oct;78(4 Suppl):615-20.
Data from the 1981 CAP Survey for factor XI assay is reviewed. Different instrument reagent combinations are ranked according to precision and sensitivity. Results of the survey questionnaire are analyzed. There is poor correlation between precision and sensitivity of most systems (i.e., instrument and reagent combinations). For any given system, precision appears to decrease with increasing severity of the factor XI deficiency of the specimen. Some comparisons are made to recent CAP surveys of factor VIII and IX activity. Considerable interlaboratory variation is noted with respect to technical aspects of factor assays (i.e., dilution of normal plasma used to construct the standard curve, etc.). Procedures used by some laboratories in handling patient specimens for factor assays, such as freezing the patient specimen, may decrease the chance of identifying a mild factor XI deficiency. The need for standardization of factor assays is evident from the survey data.
回顾了1981年CAP凝血因子XI检测调查的数据。根据精密度和灵敏度对不同的仪器试剂组合进行排名。分析了调查问卷的结果。大多数系统(即仪器和试剂组合)的精密度和灵敏度之间相关性较差。对于任何给定的系统,随着标本中凝血因子XI缺乏严重程度的增加,精密度似乎会降低。与最近CAP对凝血因子VIII和IX活性的调查进行了一些比较。在凝血因子检测的技术方面(即用于构建标准曲线的正常血浆稀释等)注意到实验室间存在相当大的差异。一些实验室在处理用于凝血因子检测的患者标本时所采用的程序,如冷冻患者标本,可能会降低识别轻度凝血因子XI缺乏的机会。从调查数据中可以明显看出凝血因子检测标准化的必要性。