Brinton B, Fujiki M
J Speech Hear Disord. 1982 Feb;47(1):57-62. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4701.57.
This study compared several discourse characteristics of linguistically normal and language-disordered children. In order to examine interactive skills, several types of request-response sequences were considered. These included choice questions, product questions, request for clarification, and the responses elicited by these speech acts. While neither the linguistically normal nor the language-disordered groups had achieved an adult level of competence, normal children were much more aware of the interactive nature of discourse than language-disordered children. Normals most often responded within the boundaries of an acceptable adult response. Language-disordered children frequently ignored and responded inappropriately to requests. Their responses were occasionally contrary to fact or totally unrelated to the expected information. Some language-disordered subjects also demonstrated linguistic strategies that facilitated the flow of conversation, but showed no understanding of the content of the communicative interchange. The clinical implications of these findings and the need for further research are discussed.
本研究比较了语言正常儿童和语言障碍儿童的几种话语特征。为了考察互动技能,研究考虑了几种类型的请求-回应序列。这些包括选择题、产物题、要求澄清以及这些言语行为引发的回应。虽然语言正常组和语言障碍组都未达到成人的能力水平,但正常儿童比语言障碍儿童更能意识到话语的互动性质。正常儿童大多在可接受的成人回应范围内做出回应。语言障碍儿童经常忽视请求并做出不恰当的回应。他们的回应偶尔与事实相反或与预期信息完全无关。一些语言障碍受试者也展示了促进对话流畅性的语言策略,但对交流互动的内容却毫无理解。本文讨论了这些发现的临床意义以及进一步研究的必要性。