McConnell D G, Young R B, Suelter C H
Muscle Nerve. 1981 Mar-Apr;4(2):125-30. doi: 10.1002/mus.880040208.
Ultrastructural comparison was made between dystrophic and normal chicken breast muscle cells which had been isolated from 12-day-old embryos and cultured for up to 14 days. All electron microscopic examinations were conducted in the absence of any knowledge as to the dystrophic or normal origin of the cells, or the day on which the cells had been harvested from culture. The same blind procedures were applied to attempts to reconstruct from electron micrographs the correct sequence of days for a particular experiment and to identify the origin of the cells as normal or dystrophic. No consistent differences between normal and dystrophic cells were apparent either in extent of differentiation, such as the formation of mature sarcomeres, or in degenerative properties, such as disintegrating mitochondria, lipid aggregations, or extracellular debris. In light of metabolic and developmental differences in these cultures, the absence of ultrastructural differences was attributed in part to the presence of cells with widely different degrees of integrity, differentiation, and degeneration in both normal and dystrophic cultures.
对从12日龄胚胎中分离并培养长达14天的营养不良型和正常鸡胸肌细胞进行了超微结构比较。所有电子显微镜检查都是在对细胞的营养不良或正常来源以及从培养物中收获细胞的日期一无所知的情况下进行的。同样的盲法程序也应用于从电子显微照片重建特定实验的正确天数顺序以及识别细胞来源是正常还是营养不良的尝试中。在分化程度(如成熟肌节的形成)或退化特性(如线粒体解体、脂质聚集或细胞外碎片)方面,正常细胞和营养不良型细胞之间没有明显的一致差异。鉴于这些培养物中的代谢和发育差异,超微结构差异的不存在部分归因于正常和营养不良型培养物中都存在完整性、分化程度和退化程度差异很大的细胞。