Leiber L, Axelrod S
Cortex. 1981 Jul;17(2):259-72. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(81)80046-9.
Information regarding age, sex, birth stress, and handedness was obtained form 762 university faculty members and 1869 undergraduate and medical students, who also provided age, sex, and handedness information for their first-degree relatives. In addition, students reported the occupations and educational levels of their parents. Analyses of the effects of birth order, reported birth stress, and maternal, paternal, and joint parental age showed that an increased incidence of sinistrality was only rarely associated with high birth risk; in all cases, the effects were confined to male subjects, most frequently male faculty members. Sinistrality was not associated with low socioeconomic status; on the contrary, there were significantly more sinistrals among parents of high than of low educational and occupational levels. The pathogenic hypothesis has other implications which fail to find support in the current literature, thus casting further doubt on the proposition that all sinistrality is pathological in origin.
从762名大学教师以及1869名本科生和医学生那里获取了有关年龄、性别、出生时的压力和用手习惯的信息,他们还提供了其一级亲属的年龄、性别和用手习惯信息。此外,学生们报告了其父母的职业和教育水平。对出生顺序、所报告的出生时的压力以及母亲、父亲和父母双方的年龄的影响进行分析后发现,左利手发生率的增加仅在极少数情况下与高出生风险相关;在所有情况下,这些影响都仅限于男性受试者,最常见的是男性教师。左利手与低社会经济地位无关;相反,高教育和职业水平的父母中左利手者明显多于低教育和职业水平的父母。致病假说还有其他一些在当前文献中未得到支持的含义,因此进一步质疑了所有左利手都源于病理的观点。