Bauer S F, Hunt H F, Gould M, Goldstein E G
Psychiatry. 1980;43(3):224-33.
Kernberg has related the level of integration of the personality to the level of integration (and "structuring") of internalized object relations. He has designated three levels of personality organization: neurotic, borderline, and psychotic, and has developed a specially focused clinical interview designed to reveal intrapsychic structural characteristics--a "structural interview"--as a diagnostic instrument to differentiate the three types of personality organization. This study presents a method of analysis of the structural interview. Interviews of ten hospitalized psychiatric patients were studied to determine whether indicators could be retrieved from the typescripts of the interviews consonant with the diagnoses made by clinicians utilizing Kernberg's structural theory. Results indicate that scores generated from the typescripts are consistent with the hypothesis that the interviews did contain the indicators called for by structural theory and differentiate borderline from psychotic structures better than chance. In addition, this method of analysis of contingencies of interaction in the interview may have broader application to the study of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis.
克恩伯格将人格的整合水平与内化客体关系的整合水平(以及“结构化”)联系起来。他划分了三种人格组织水平:神经症性、边缘性和精神病性,并开发了一种专门聚焦的临床访谈,旨在揭示心理内部结构特征——一种“结构化访谈”——作为区分这三种人格组织类型的诊断工具。本研究提出了一种分析结构化访谈的方法。对十名住院精神科患者的访谈进行了研究,以确定是否能从访谈记录中提取出与运用克恩伯格结构理论的临床医生所做诊断相符的指标。结果表明,从记录中得出的分数与以下假设一致,即访谈确实包含结构理论所要求的指标,并且能比随机情况更好地区分边缘性结构和精神病性结构。此外,这种对访谈中互动偶然性的分析方法可能在心理治疗和精神分析研究中有更广泛的应用。