Karsch K R, Schicha H, Rentrop P, Blanke H, Kreuzer H, Emrich D
Z Kardiol. 1980 Aug;69(8):536-41.
Thallium-201 scintigraphy was performed in 20 normals and 60 patients (pts) with angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD) at rest after maximal exercise for evaluation of severity and location of CAD. The Tl-scintigrams were quantified by a Tl-score. The results of the Tl-score were compared with invasive and non-invasive parameters. Sensitivity asnd specificity of the Tl-score in evaluation of CAD was 90%. In normals, there were no significant differences from rest to exercise (Tl-score less than or equal to 1.2). Twenty-six of the pts with CAD, who had no evidence of myocardial infarction, showed a significant increase of Tl-score from 5.0 +/- 1.7 to 8.7 +/- 2.6 after exercise (p < 0.001). In 34 pts with CAD and a history of MI, Tl-score increased from 24.9 +/- 3.1 to 33.3 +/- 3.8 (p < 0.001). Exercised-induced ischemia was assessed by exercise electrocardiography in 48%, by Tl-score in 62% and by angina pectoris in 77%. In 37 pts, the Tl-score was compared with the coronary score, ejection fraction (EF) and local wall motion derived from biplane cineventriculograms. There was a significant correlation between the Tl-score and the EF: y = 79.13 - 1.11 x, n = 74, r = 0.688 (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between the coronary score and the Tl-score. Hypokinetic wall motion disturbances were assessed by Tl-score in 34% only, whereas akinesia and dyskinesia were detected in 86% (p < 0.001). The data suggest that Tl-scintigraphy even with a quantitative Tl-score is not sufficient for exact assessment of extent and severity of CAD.
对20名正常人和60例经血管造影证实患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者在最大运动量后静息状态下进行铊-201闪烁扫描,以评估CAD的严重程度和位置。通过铊评分对铊闪烁扫描图进行量化。将铊评分结果与有创和无创参数进行比较。铊评分在评估CAD时的敏感性和特异性为90%。在正常人中,静息状态与运动状态之间无显著差异(铊评分小于或等于1.2)。26例无心肌梗死证据的CAD患者运动后铊评分从5.0±1.7显著增加至8.7±2.6(p<0.001)。在34例有心肌梗死病史的CAD患者中,铊评分从24.9±3.1增加至33.3±3.8(p<0.001)。通过运动心电图评估运动诱发缺血的比例为48%,通过铊评分评估的比例为62%,通过心绞痛评估的比例为77%。在37例患者中,将铊评分与冠状动脉评分、射血分数(EF)以及从双平面电影心室造影获得的局部室壁运动进行比较。铊评分与EF之间存在显著相关性:y = 79.13 - 1.11x,n = 74,r = 0.688(p<0.001)。未发现冠状动脉评分与铊评分之间存在相关性。仅通过铊评分评估运动减弱性室壁运动障碍的比例为34%,而检测到运动不能和运动障碍的比例为86%(p<0.001)。数据表明,即使采用定量铊评分的铊闪烁扫描也不足以准确评估CAD的范围和严重程度。