Manwell C, Baker C M
Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet. 1980;11(3):151-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1980.tb01504.x.
Phylogenetic trees for the ten major breed groups of cattle were constructed by Farris's (1972) maximum parsimony method, or Fitch & Margoliash's (1967) method, which averages ou the deviation over the entire assemblage. Both techniques yield essentially identical trees. The phylogenetic tree for the ten major cattle breed groups can be superimposed on a map of Europe and western Asia, the root of the tree being close to the 'fertile crescent' in Asia Minor, believed to be a primary centre of bovine domestication. For some but not all protein variants there is a cline of gene frequencies as one proceeds from the British Isles and northwest Europe towards southeast Europe and Asia Minor, with the most extreme gene frequencies in the Zebu breeds of India. It is not clear to what extent the observed clines are primary or secondary, i.e., consequent to the initial migrations of cattle towards the end of the Pleistocene or consequent to the many migrations of man with his domesticated cattle. Such clines as exist are not in themselves sufficient to prove either selection versus genetic drift or to establish taxonomic ranking. Contrary to some suggestions in the literature, the biochemical evidence supports Linnaeus's original conclusions: Bos taurus and Bos indicus are distinct species.
利用法里斯(1972年)的最大简约法或菲奇和马戈利亚什(1967年)的方法构建了牛的十个主要品种组的系统发育树,后者是对整个群体的偏差进行平均。这两种技术产生的树基本相同。牛的十个主要品种组的系统发育树可以叠加在欧洲和西亚的地图上,树的根部靠近小亚细亚的“肥沃新月地带”,这里被认为是牛驯化的主要中心。对于一些但并非所有的蛋白质变体,从不列颠群岛和欧洲西北部向欧洲东南部和小亚细亚推进时,基因频率存在渐变,印度瘤牛品种中的基因频率最为极端。目前尚不清楚观察到的渐变在多大程度上是原发性的还是继发性的,也就是说,是牛在更新世末期最初迁徙的结果,还是人类与其驯化的牛多次迁徙的结果。现有的这种渐变本身不足以证明是选择还是基因漂变,也不足以确立分类等级。与文献中的一些观点相反,生化证据支持林奈的原始结论:普通牛和瘤牛是不同的物种。