Suppr超能文献

新生儿急性生理学评分:在三个凯撒医疗机构新生儿重症监护病房的验证

Score for neonatal acute physiology: validation in three Kaiser Permanente neonatal intensive care units.

作者信息

Escobar G J, Fischer A, Li D K, Kremers R, Armstrong M A

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Division of Research, Oakland, CA 94611, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):918-22.

PMID:7478836
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measurement of the severity of illness is a research area of growing importance in neonatal intensive care. Most severity of illness scales have been developed in tertiary care settings. Their applicability in community neonatal intensive care units has not been tested.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to assess the operational characteristics of the score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP): the relationship to birth weight, the length of total hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

We assigned SNAP scores prospectively to all inborn admissions at three community neonatal intensive care units during an 11-month period. Data on other neonatal predictors (eg, birth weight and the presence of congenital heart disease) were also collected. We measured in-hospital mortality, the experience of interhospital transport to a higher level of care, and total hospital stay.

RESULTS

We found that the SNAP's relationship to birth weight was similar to previous reports. The SNAP's perinatal extension is a reliable predictor of newborn in-hospital mortality, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.95. The SNAP is also a good predictor of total hospital length of stay, whether by itself (by which it can explain 31% of the total stay) or in combination with other variables. Its predictive ability is better among infants of low birth weight (<2500 g) than among those of normal birth weight (> or = 2500 g). The SNAP's predictive power was most limited among infants admitted to rule out sepsis. The predictive ability of a model containing birth weight, the SNAP, and transport status was not improved by the inclusion of two major diagnostic categories, the presence of congenital heart disease or complex illness.

CONCLUSION

Although it has definite limitations among infants who weight 2500 g or more, the SNAP is a potent tool for outcomes research. Modification of some of its parameters could result in a multifunctional scale suitable for use with all birth weights.

摘要

背景

疾病严重程度的测量是新生儿重症监护中一个日益重要的研究领域。大多数疾病严重程度量表是在三级医疗机构中开发的。它们在社区新生儿重症监护病房的适用性尚未得到检验。

目的

我们的目标是评估新生儿急性生理学评分(SNAP)的操作特性:与出生体重、总住院时间和院内死亡率的关系。

方法

在11个月期间,我们前瞻性地为三个社区新生儿重症监护病房的所有入院新生儿分配SNAP评分。还收集了其他新生儿预测因素(如出生体重和先天性心脏病的存在)的数据。我们测量了院内死亡率、转至更高护理水平的院际转运情况以及总住院时间。

结果

我们发现SNAP与出生体重的关系与先前的报告相似。SNAP的围产期扩展是新生儿院内死亡率的可靠预测指标,受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.95。SNAP也是总住院时间的良好预测指标,无论是单独使用(可解释总住院时间的31%)还是与其他变量结合使用。其预测能力在低出生体重(<2500g)婴儿中比在正常出生体重(≥2500g)婴儿中更好。SNAP在因排除败血症而入院的婴儿中的预测能力最有限。包含出生体重、SNAP和转运状态的模型的预测能力并未因纳入两个主要诊断类别(先天性心脏病或复杂疾病的存在)而得到改善。

结论

尽管SNAP在体重2500g及以上的婴儿中存在一定局限性,但它是结果研究的有力工具。对其一些参数进行修改可能会产生一个适用于所有出生体重的多功能量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验