Suppr超能文献

利用针对蜱传脑炎病毒(全沟硬蜱亚型)包膜糖蛋白的单克隆抗体对蜱传脑炎(TBE)复合病毒进行表位分析。

Epitope analysis of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) complex viruses using monoclonal antibodies to envelope glycoprotein of TBE virus (persulcatus subtype).

作者信息

Tsekhanovskaya N A, Matveev L E, Rubin S G, Karavanov A S, Pressman E K

机构信息

Novosibirsk Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia.

出版信息

Virus Res. 1993 Oct;30(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(93)90011-b.

Abstract

The arrangement of envelope protein epitopes of tick-borne encephalitis viruses (TBEV) (persulcatus or eastern subtype, Sofjin strain and ricinus or western subtype, Minsk-256 strain) and Kyasanur Forest disease virus (KFDV) was investigated using competitive binding of monoclonal antibodies against the Sofjin E protein. The E protein of TBEV Sofjin strain forms three antigenic domains: E1, E2 and E3, represented by 12, 9 and 2 epitopes respectively; two additional epitopes stand alone. Domains E1 and E2 are heterogeneous. On the epitope map of the Minsk-256 strain domain E3 remains intact, domains E1 and E2 overlap and the relative arrangement of virus-neutralizing epitopes from E1 and E2 domains is changed. The epitope map of KFDV is significantly dissimilar to TBEV. The viruses can be distinguished by epitopes with identical serological reactivity. A satisfactory agreement between our epitope maps and previously published antigenic models of flavivirus envelope protein (Guirakhoo et al., 1989; Mandl et al., 1989a) was observed. The main difference of our map is that domains corresponding to domains B and C (Sofjin strain) and A, B and C (Minsk-256 strain) in Heinz's model are overlapping. The results of competition analysis depend on the nature of the antigen (virion or purified protein) and the immunoassay technique.

摘要

利用针对索非金株E蛋白的单克隆抗体的竞争结合,研究了蜱传脑炎病毒(TBEV)(全沟硬蜱或东部亚型,索非金株和蓖麻硬蜱或西部亚型,明斯克-256株)和凯萨努尔森林病病毒(KFDV)包膜蛋白表位的排列。TBEV索非金株的E蛋白形成三个抗原结构域:E1、E2和E3,分别由12、9和2个表位代表;另有两个表位单独存在。结构域E1和E2是异质性的。在明斯克-256株的表位图谱上,结构域E3保持完整,结构域E1和E2重叠,并且来自E1和E2结构域的病毒中和表位的相对排列发生了变化。KFDV的表位图谱与TBEV显著不同。这些病毒可以通过具有相同血清学反应性的表位来区分。我们的表位图谱与先前发表的黄病毒包膜蛋白抗原模型(Guirakhoo等人,1989年;Mandl等人,1989a)之间观察到了令人满意的一致性。我们图谱的主要差异在于,在海因茨模型中与结构域B和C(索非金株)以及结构域A、B和C(明斯克-256株)相对应的结构域是重叠的。竞争分析的结果取决于抗原的性质(病毒体或纯化蛋白)和免疫测定技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验