Kawamura K, Kikuyama A, Moriyama M, Nakajima C, Shiba N, Kobayashi S, Magome A, Kido C, Miyazawa K, Tanaka T
Department of Urology, Kanazawa Medical University.
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1993 Nov;39(11):993-6.
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) of prostate was administered to 10 patients with bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The mean age of the patients was 74.4 years (range 63 to 85). The Prostatron device, which provides microwave heating of the prostate and conductive cooling of the urethra was used, and the prostate was heated with a calculated intraprostatic temperature of 45.5 degrees C for 55 minutes. No anesthesia was required for most of the patients. The clinical effects were evaluated at 4-6 weeks and 3 months after treatment. The symptomatic scores improved in the majority of patients. There was no significant change in prostate volume. The maximum flow rate and average flow rate were increased at 6 weeks and 3 months, but there was no significant change. The only side effects were transient hematuria and short-term obstruction secondary to urethral edema. In comparing TUMT with the transurethral resection of prostate (TUR-P), the maximum flow rate after TUMT was lower than that after TUR-P and the improvement of residual urine after TUMT was lower than that after TUR-P.
对10例因良性前列腺增生导致膀胱出口梗阻的患者进行了经尿道前列腺微波热疗(TUMT)。患者的平均年龄为74.4岁(范围63至85岁)。使用了能对前列腺进行微波加热并对尿道进行传导冷却的Prostatron设备,将前列腺加热至计算得出的前列腺内温度45.5摄氏度并持续55分钟。大多数患者无需麻醉。在治疗后4 - 6周和3个月评估临床效果。大多数患者的症状评分有所改善。前列腺体积无显著变化。最大尿流率和平均尿流率在6周和3个月时有所增加,但无显著变化。唯一的副作用是短暂性血尿和继发于尿道水肿的短期梗阻。与经尿道前列腺切除术(TUR - P)相比,TUMT后的最大尿流率低于TUR - P后,TUMT后残余尿量的改善低于TUR - P后。