Sotos G A, Grogan L, Allegra C J
NCI-Navy Medical Oncology Branch, Bethesda, MD 20889-5101.
Cancer Treat Rev. 1994 Jan;20(1):11-49. doi: 10.1016/0305-7372(94)90009-4.
Although single agent 5-FU has for many years been the standard therapy for advanced colorectal malignancies, a number of recent clinical trials show higher response rates with biomodulation of 5-FU by several different agents. In general, trials of leucovorin, methotrexate, interferon, and PALA given in biomodulatory doses and sequences with 5-FU have demonstrated comparable response rates over a broad range. However, in the absence of controlled direct comparative phase III trials, final judgement on clinical superiority of a particular regimen must be reserved. Nevertheless, on the basis of current data, certain approaches appear promising and warrant further investigation. Compared to single agent 5-FU, survival benefit has been demonstrated with both low and high dose leucovorin/5-FU regimens and response rates in the 20-50% range appear reproducibly higher than those of 5-FU alone. Low dose and either continuous infusion or repetitive dosing of leucovorin, as well as the effect of treatment sequence and intervals between drugs, require additional investigation. When given 20-24 h before 5-FU, methotrexate achieves response rates similar to leucovorin modulated 5-FU, but the potential role of rescue leucovorin used in many of the trials makes definitive interpretation difficult. Interferon/5-FU regimens attaining response rates of 30-40% are promising but need to be carefully and rationally designed. Low dose PALA with effective doses of 5-FU achieving responses in 35-45% of patients represent a marked improvement in earlier trials of high dose PALA, but additional studies with higher doses not compromising 5-FU dose intensity should be considered. Certainly, the concomitant use of multiple modulating agents also needs further investigation. While many such trials already performed attained results no better than single agent biomodulation, the preliminary results obtained by Grem and colleagues with IFN/LV/5-FU in untreated patients, and by Conti et al. using TMTX/LV/5-FU in previously treated patients are encouraging. Further understanding of the mechanisms of action and interaction of modulating agents should allow additional rational combinations to be explored clinically. Cisplatin biomodulation of 5-FU has been studied in gastrointestinal and head and neck malignancies achieving excellent results in the latter group. Preclinical evidence exists which suggests, however, that 5-FU modulation of cisplatin may be more effective, especially when 5-FU is administered 24 h or more before cisplatin. Clinical investigation of this sequence is currently lacking. Data to support the clinical promise of AZT, IdUrd, uridine, and the benzylacyclouridines are not yet available, although preclinical and preliminary clinical studies are promising.
尽管多年来单药5-氟尿嘧啶一直是晚期结直肠癌的标准治疗方法,但最近的一些临床试验表明,几种不同药物对5-氟尿嘧啶进行生物调节可提高缓解率。一般来说,以生物调节剂量和顺序给予亚叶酸、甲氨蝶呤、干扰素和磷乙天冬氨酸并与5-氟尿嘧啶联合应用的试验,在很大范围内都显示出相当的缓解率。然而,由于缺乏对照的直接比较性III期试验,对于特定方案的临床优越性的最终判断仍需保留。尽管如此,根据目前的数据,某些方法似乎很有前景,值得进一步研究。与单药5-氟尿嘧啶相比,低剂量和高剂量亚叶酸/5-氟尿嘧啶方案均已证明有生存获益,且20%-50%范围内的缓解率似乎可重复性地高于单用5-氟尿嘧啶。低剂量亚叶酸的持续输注或重复给药,以及治疗顺序和药物间隔时间的影响,都需要进一步研究。在5-氟尿嘧啶前20-24小时给予甲氨蝶呤,其缓解率与亚叶酸调节的5-氟尿嘧啶相似,但许多试验中使用的亚叶酸解救的潜在作用使得难以做出明确解释。干扰素/5-氟尿嘧啶方案的缓解率达到30%-40%,很有前景,但需要仔细合理地设计。低剂量磷乙天冬氨酸与有效剂量的5-氟尿嘧啶联合应用,使35%-45%的患者获得缓解,这比早期高剂量磷乙天冬氨酸试验有显著改善,但应考虑进行不影响5-氟尿嘧啶剂量强度的更高剂量的进一步研究。当然,多种调节药物的联合使用也需要进一步研究。虽然已经进行的许多此类试验取得的结果并不比单药生物调节更好,但Grem及其同事在未治疗患者中使用干扰素/亚叶酸/5-氟尿嘧啶,以及Conti等人在先前治疗的患者中使用三甲氨蝶呤/亚叶酸/5-氟尿嘧啶所获得的初步结果令人鼓舞。对调节药物的作用机制和相互作用的进一步了解,应有助于在临床上探索更多合理的联合用药方案。5-氟尿嘧啶的顺铂生物调节已在胃肠道和头颈部恶性肿瘤中进行了研究,在后一组中取得了优异的结果。然而,临床前证据表明,5-氟尿嘧啶对顺铂的调节可能更有效,尤其是当5-氟尿嘧啶在顺铂前24小时或更长时间给药时。目前缺乏对此给药顺序的临床研究。虽然临床前和初步临床研究很有前景,但支持齐多夫定、碘苷、尿苷和苄基阿糖胞苷临床应用前景的数据尚未获得。