Johnson A E, Shekhdar J
Breast Study Centre, Mount Vernon and Watford Hospitals NHS Trust, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1995 Aug;68(812):862-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-812-862.
The National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme defines objectives with acceptable and, where possible, achievable standards. This paper examines the problem of interval cancers. Slopes due to shrinkage of primary breast cancers in response to primary systemic therapy are used as surrogates for growth slopes. From the distribution of these slopes the proportion of tumours which might reach particular sizes in any time interval may be estimated. For specific differences in size between screen and clinical detection levels the number of interval cancers which could appear in 1, 2 and 3 years after screening is estimated. The justification for these predictions is evaluated. The literature in relation to growth is reviewed; we add three growth slopes from our own measurements. The range of volume doubling times and volume halving times is the same whereas the mean value derived from the literature is about 90 days in contrast to only 26 days for inferred growth rates. Because of the difficulties inherent in the measurement of growth, it is concluded that the literature defines the left half of a distribution; the right hand side is completed by shrinkage data. The observed rates for interval cancers from different sources vary widely; there is an underlying assumption that interval cancers are an index of failure. These calculations suggest that there is an irreducible minimum of interval cancers, which will depend upon the screening interval and the size at which tumours are detected. The interval cancers will contain more poorly differentiated tumours. The anticipated achievable standards appear to be over optimistic.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)乳腺癌筛查项目制定了具有可接受且尽可能可实现标准的目标。本文探讨了间期癌的问题。原发性乳腺癌在接受原发性全身治疗后因缩小而产生的斜率被用作生长斜率的替代指标。根据这些斜率的分布,可以估计在任何时间间隔内可能达到特定大小的肿瘤比例。对于筛查和临床检测水平之间特定的大小差异,估计了筛查后1年、2年和3年内可能出现的间期癌数量。对这些预测的合理性进行了评估。回顾了与生长相关的文献;我们补充了来自自身测量的三个生长斜率。体积倍增时间和体积减半时间的范围相同,而从文献中得出的平均值约为90天,相比之下,推断生长率的平均值仅为26天。由于生长测量存在固有困难,得出的结论是,文献定义了分布的左半部分;右侧由缩小数据补充完整。不同来源观察到的间期癌发生率差异很大;存在一个潜在的假设,即间期癌是失败的一个指标。这些计算表明,间期癌存在一个不可减少的最小值,这将取决于筛查间隔和检测到肿瘤时的大小。间期癌将包含更多低分化肿瘤。预期可实现的标准似乎过于乐观。