Jones S, Winer E, Vogel C, Laufman L, Hutchins L, O'Rourke M, Lembersky B, Budman D, Bigley J, Hohneker J
Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Oct;13(10):2567-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.10.2567.
This prospective multicenter randomized trial was performed to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine [NVB]; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC) with i.v. melphalan (Alkeran [ALK]; Burroughs Wellcome Co) in a heavily pretreated population of patients with anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer (ABC). Efficacy end points included time to disease progression (TDP), time to treatment failure (TTF), survival, tumor response rates, and quality of life (QL) and relief of cancer-related symptoms.
Between August 24, 1990, and December 1, 1992, 183 patients were randomized (2:1) to treatment with NVB (30 mg/m2 weekly) or ALK (25 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) i.v. Patients were stratified by measurable or nonmeasurable-assessable disease and by treatment center.
Time to disease progression was significantly longer with NVB than with ALK, with a median 12 weeks versus 8 weeks, respectively (P < .001). NVB patients also had significantly longer time to treatment failure than ALK patients, with a median 12 weeks versus 8 weeks, respectively (P < .001). The effect of NVB on survival was also statistically significant (P = .034): 1-year survival rates were 35.7% with NVB and 21.7% with ALK and the median survival rate was 35 weeks and 31 weeks, respectively. In total, 46.5% of NVB patients and 28.2% of ALK patients achieved an objective response or stabilization of disease (P = .06). No intergroup differences were noted in patient-assessed QL and cancer-related symptoms. The most common toxicities were hematologic, including granulocytopenia with NVB and thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia with ALK. Both drugs were generally well tolerated, and no septic deaths were reported.
This randomized trial demonstrates a survival benefit in anthracycline-refractory ABC. NVB was well tolerated and demonstrated activity superior to ALK in anthracycline-refractory ABC, without compromising QL. Based on activity of single-agent NVB in this difficult-to-treat patient population, investigations of NVB in combination with other anticancer drugs are warranted.
开展这项前瞻性多中心随机试验,以比较静脉注射酒石酸长春瑞滨(诺维本[NVB];百时美施贵宝公司,北卡罗来纳州三角研究园)与静脉注射美法仑(马法兰[ALK];百时美施贵宝公司)在蒽环类药物难治性晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的大量预处理患者群体中的有效性和安全性。疗效终点包括疾病进展时间(TDP)、治疗失败时间(TTF)、生存率、肿瘤缓解率、生活质量(QL)以及癌症相关症状的缓解情况。
在1990年8月24日至1992年12月1日期间,183例患者被随机分组(2:1),分别接受静脉注射NVB(30mg/m²每周)或ALK(25mg/m²每4周)治疗。患者按可测量或不可测量 - 可评估疾病以及治疗中心进行分层。
NVB组的疾病进展时间显著长于ALK组,中位数分别为12周和8周(P <.001)。NVB组患者的治疗失败时间也显著长于ALK组患者,中位数分别为12周和8周(P <.001)。NVB对生存率的影响也具有统计学意义(P =.034):NVB组的1年生存率为35.7%,ALK组为21.7%,中位生存率分别为35周和31周。总体而言,46.5%的NVB组患者和28.2%的ALK组患者实现了疾病的客观缓解或病情稳定(P =.06)。在患者评估的QL和癌症相关症状方面未发现组间差异。最常见的毒性反应为血液学毒性,NVB组为粒细胞减少,ALK组为血小板减少和粒细胞减少。两种药物总体耐受性良好,未报告败血症死亡病例。
这项随机试验表明,在蒽环类药物难治性ABC患者中,NVB具有生存获益。NVB耐受性良好,在蒽环类药物难治性ABC中显示出优于ALK的活性,且不影响QL。基于单药NVB在这一难治性患者群体中的活性,有必要对NVB与其他抗癌药物联合应用进行研究。