Allen K D, Hodges E D, Knudsen S K
Pediatr Dent. 1995 May-Jun;17(3):180-6.
One hundred twenty parents were shown descriptions of eight traditional behavior management techniques via one of four different presentation methods: one of two types of video presentation, an oral presentation, or a written presentation. They were asked whether they felt well informed about each technique and asked for consent to perform any one of the techniques that might be needed with their child. Fisher's exact test found that a written explanation resulted in parents who felt well informed significantly less often than those in the other conditions, while an oral presentation resulted in parents who felt well informed more often than those in the other groups, although this difference was not statistically significant. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) found no significant differences between the four conditions with respect to parents providing consent, however, exact tests found the oral method produced significantly better consent for some individual procedures. More than 60% of the parents considered information about each technique to be material or consequential to their decision to consent. Acceptability was correlated with consent, however, more than 10% of the respondents reported incongruencies between consent and acceptability (high approval ratings without subsequent consent or low approval ratings followed by consent). Overall, the oral method of delivering information to parents about child behavior management techniques was the best method of ensuring that the average parent felt informed and was likely to consent.
通过四种不同的呈现方式之一,向120位家长展示了八种传统行为管理技巧的描述:两种视频呈现方式中的一种、口头呈现或书面呈现。询问他们是否觉得对每种技巧都有充分的了解,并要求他们同意对自己孩子实施可能需要的任何一种技巧。费舍尔精确检验发现,书面解释使觉得了解充分的家长比例显著低于其他情况,而口头呈现使觉得了解充分的家长比例高于其他组,尽管这种差异在统计学上并不显著。方差分析(ANOVA)发现,在家长同意方面,四种情况之间没有显著差异,然而,精确检验发现口头方式对某些个别程序产生的同意效果显著更好。超过60%的家长认为每种技巧的信息对他们同意的决定至关重要。可接受性与同意相关,然而,超过10%的受访者报告了同意与可接受性之间的不一致(高批准率但随后未同意,或低批准率后又同意)。总体而言,向家长传达儿童行为管理技巧信息的口头方式是确保普通家长感到了解并可能同意的最佳方式。