Faber L M, van der Hoeven J, Goulmy E, Hooftman-den Otter A L, van Luxemburg-Heijs S A, Willemze R, Falkenburg J H
Department of Hematology, University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Clin Invest. 1995 Aug;96(2):877-83. doi: 10.1172/JCI118134.
We investigated whether minor histocompatibility (mH) antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) can discriminate between leukemic hematopoietic progenitor cells (leukemic-HPC) from AML or CML patients, the HPC from their remission bone marrow (remission-HPC), and normal HPC from their HLA-identical sibling bone marrow donor (donor-HPC). Specific lysis by CD8+ CTL clones was observed not only of the leukemic-HPC but also of the donor-HPC in 3/4 patient/donor combinations expressing mH antigen HA-1, 3/5 combinations expressing mH antigen HA-2, 2/3 combinations expressing mH antigen HA-3, and 2/2 combinations expressing mH antigen HY-A1. In four patient/donor combinations the recognition of the donor-HPC was clearly less than of the leukemic-HPC, indicating differential susceptibility to lysis by these mH CTL clones. In addition, differential recognition of leukemic-HPC and remission-HPC within seven patients was analyzed. In one patient expressing the HA-2 antigen on the leukemic cells the recognition of the remission-HPC was clearly less than of the leukemic-HPC. One CD4+ CTL clone showed specific lysis of the leukemic-HPC from an AML patient and a CML patient as well as of normal remission-HPC and donor-HPC. These results illustrate that in general CD8+ and CD4+ mH antigen specific CTL clones do not differentially recognize leukemic-HPC and normal-HPC. However, differences in susceptibility to lysis of malignant versus normal cells may contribute to a differential GVL effect.
我们研究了次要组织相容性(mH)抗原特异性细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)是否能够区分急性髓系白血病(AML)或慢性髓系白血病(CML)患者的白血病造血祖细胞(白血病-HPC)、其缓解期骨髓中的造血祖细胞(缓解期-HPC)以及来自与其HLA匹配的同胞骨髓供体的正常造血祖细胞(供体-HPC)。在表达mH抗原HA-1的3/4患者/供体组合、表达mH抗原HA-2的3/5组合、表达mH抗原HA-3的2/3组合以及表达mH抗原HY-A1的2/2组合中,不仅观察到CD8+ CTL克隆对白血病-HPC有特异性裂解作用,对供体-HPC也有特异性裂解作用。在四个患者/供体组合中,可以明显看出对供体-HPC的识别明显低于对白血病-HPC的识别,这表明这些mH CTL克隆对细胞裂解的敏感性存在差异。此外,还分析了七名患者中白血病-HPC和缓解期-HPC的差异识别情况。在一名白血病细胞上表达HA-2抗原的患者中,对缓解期-HPC的识别明显低于对白血病-HPC的识别。一个CD4+ CTL克隆对一名AML患者和一名CML患者的白血病-HPC以及正常缓解期-HPC和供体-HPC均表现出特异性裂解作用。这些结果表明,一般来说,CD8+和CD4+ mH抗原特异性CTL克隆对白血病-HPC和正常-HPC没有差异识别。然而,恶性细胞与正常细胞在细胞裂解敏感性上的差异可能导致移植物抗白血病(GVL)效应的差异。