Suppr超能文献

使用刚果红和免疫组织化学对AA型淀粉样变性进行高灵敏度诊断可检测出遗漏的淀粉样沉积物。

High-sensitivity diagnosis of AA amyloidosis using Congo red and immunohistochemistry detects missed amyloid deposits.

作者信息

Linke R P, Gärtner H V, Michels H

机构信息

Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.

出版信息

J Histochem Cytochem. 1995 Sep;43(9):863-9. doi: 10.1177/43.9.7642960.

Abstract

Biopsy diagnosis of early amyloid-A (AA) amyloidosis has often been difficult. Examination of 57 consecutive biopsy specimens from 42 patients with inflammatory pediatric diseases permitted comparison of the precision of biopsy amyloid diagnosis in six different laboratories (labs), which applied the following methods: Congo red alone (four unspecialized labs combined as Lab 1), Congo red and electron microscopy (Lab 2), or Congo red and immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies (Lab 3). Lab 3 reexamined the diagnoses made by Lab 1 and Lab 2. Of the 42 patients, 17 patients with 32 biopsies were selected for this study based on the presence of amyloid in at least one biopsy. Whereas massive or no amyloid was concordantly recognized by all labs in 18 biopsies from nine patients, discordance was demonstrated in 14 biopsies from eight patients. Comparison of Labs 1-3 revealed amyloid in 12 rectal and 18 renal biopsies evaluated by Lab 3, whereas Lab 2 missed amyloid in two of 18 renal biopsies and Lab 1 missed amyloid in 11 of 12 rectal biopsies. Most amyloid was missed when only minute amounts of amyloid were present. Had our technique (Lab 3) been available at the time of biopsy, amyloid could have been diagnosed years earlier, thereby sparing the patient further biopsies and allowing initiation of earlier treatment before organ damage could occur.

摘要

早期淀粉样蛋白A(AA)淀粉样变性的活检诊断常常具有挑战性。对42例患有炎症性儿科疾病的患者的57份连续活检标本进行检查,从而能够比较六个不同实验室(实验室)活检淀粉样变性诊断的准确性,这些实验室采用了以下方法:单独使用刚果红(四个非专业实验室合并为实验室1)、刚果红和电子显微镜检查(实验室2),或刚果红和使用单克隆抗体的免疫组织化学检查(实验室3)。实验室3重新检查了实验室1和实验室2做出的诊断。在42例患者中,基于至少一次活检中存在淀粉样蛋白,选择了17例患者的32份活检标本进行本研究。九个患者的18份活检标本中,所有实验室对大量淀粉样蛋白或无淀粉样蛋白的识别结果一致,而八个患者的14份活检标本中则出现了不一致的情况。实验室1 - 3的比较显示,实验室3评估的12份直肠活检标本和18份肾活检标本中发现了淀粉样蛋白,而实验室2在18份肾活检标本中有两份漏诊了淀粉样蛋白,实验室1在12份直肠活检标本中有11份漏诊了淀粉样蛋白。当仅存在微量淀粉样蛋白时,大多数淀粉样蛋白会被漏诊。如果在活检时我们的技术(实验室3)就已可用,淀粉样变性可能在数年前就能被诊断出来,从而避免患者进行进一步的活检,并在器官损伤发生之前更早地开始治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验