• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHOP方案与CNOP方案治疗中高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的多中心随机对照III期试验的长期结果。诺维本国际研究组

Long-term results of a multicentre randomised, comparative phase III trial of CHOP versus CNOP regimens in patients with intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Novantrone International Study Group.

作者信息

Bezwoda W, Rastogi R B, Erazo Valla A, Diaz-Maqueo J C, Pavlovsky S, Morioka H, Resegotti L, Rueckle H, Somoza N, Moreno-Nogueira J A

机构信息

Haematology Unit, Johannesburg Hospital, South Africa.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1995 Jun;31A(6):903-11. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00076-3.

DOI:10.1016/0959-8049(95)00076-3
PMID:7646919
Abstract

59 previously untreated patients with intermediate- or high-grade, stage II-IV non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were entered into an open-label, randomised, multicentre study to compare the efficacy and safety of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) with that of CNOP (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, vincristine and prednisolone). 10 patients refused treatment following randomisation. The remaining 349 patients received either the CHOP or CNOP regimen every 3 weeks for a maximum of six to eight cycles. The randomisation procedure was violated for 34 patients treated at two study centres. Data from these 34 patients were analysed separately for efficacy and survival. Data from the remaining 325 patients, 164 assigned to CHOP and 161 to CNOP, were used in the major efficacy and survival analyses. Of these 325 patients, 263 (81%) met the eligibility criteria of the protocol. Supplementary analyses of data from these 263 patients, 132 assigned to CHOP and 131 to CNOP, were conducted for efficacy and survival. Data from all 349 treated patients were analysed for safety. In the 325 randomised patients, the overall objective response rate was not significantly different between the two groups (chi 2 test, P = 0.35). The CHOP regimen had a 51% (83/164) complete remission (CR) rate compared with 40% (64/161) for the CNOP regimen (P = 0.05). Among those with CR, the median time to response was 104 days with the CHOP regimen and 77 days with the CNOP regimen, and the median duration of CR was 667 and 1833 days, respectively. The median time to progression was 449 days for CHOP patients and 564 days for CNOP patients. The median survival time was 932 days for CHOP patients and 1801 days for CNOP patients, with a risk of death on CNOP relative to CHOP of 0.93% (95% confidence interval 0.68-1.27). After 5 years, 50% of patients in the CNOP arm and 40% of patients in the CHOP arm were still alive; these differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 285 days for patients on the CHOP arm and 282 days for patients on the CNOP arm. Separate analyses of 263 eligible randomised patients, and 34 patients in whom the randomisation procedure was not followed, yielded similar results for remission rate, TTF, duration of CR and estimated overall survival. The incidence of non-haematological events, such as severe nausea and vomiting (P < 0.01), mucositis (P < 0.05) and alopecia (P < 0.001), were significantly lower in were significantly lower in patients treated with CNOP as compared with those who received the CHOP regimen. The incidence of cardiovascular toxicity of any severity was similar in the two groups. While severe and potentially life-threatening neutropenia occurred more frequently in patients treated with CNOP compared with CHOP (0.05 > P > 0.10), the incidence of infection of any severity was similar in both arms. We conclude that CHOP and CNOP regimens were both efficacious in patients with previously untreated aggressive NHL.

摘要

59例未经治疗的中高级别II-IV期非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者进入一项开放标签、随机、多中心研究,以比较CHOP(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松龙)与CNOP(环磷酰胺、米托蒽醌、长春新碱和泼尼松龙)的疗效和安全性。10例患者在随机分组后拒绝治疗。其余349例患者每3周接受CHOP或CNOP方案治疗,最多6至8个周期。在两个研究中心接受治疗的34例患者违反了随机程序。对这34例患者的数据分别进行疗效和生存分析。其余325例患者的数据,164例分配至CHOP组,161例分配至CNOP组,用于主要疗效和生存分析。在这325例患者中,263例(81%)符合方案的入选标准。对这263例患者的数据进行补充分析,132例分配至CHOP组,131例分配至CNOP组,进行疗效和生存分析。对所有349例接受治疗的患者的数据进行安全性分析。在325例随机分组的患者中,两组的总体客观缓解率无显著差异(卡方检验,P = 0.35)。CHOP方案的完全缓解(CR)率为51%(83/164),而CNOP方案为40%(64/161)(P = 0.05)。在CR患者中,CHOP方案的中位缓解时间为104天,CNOP方案为77天,CR的中位持续时间分别为667天和1833天。CHOP组患者的中位进展时间为449天,CNOP组为564天。CHOP组患者的中位生存时间为932天,CNOP组为1801天,CNOP相对于CHOP的死亡风险为0.93%(95%置信区间0.68-1.27)。5年后,CNOP组50%的患者和CHOP组40%的患者仍存活;治疗组之间的这些差异无统计学意义。CHOP组患者的中位治疗失败时间(TTF)为285天,CNOP组为282天。对263例符合入选标准的随机分组患者以及34例未遵循随机程序的患者进行单独分析,在缓解率、TTF、CR持续时间和估计总生存方面得出了相似的结果。与接受CHOP方案治疗的患者相比,接受CNOP治疗的患者非血液学事件的发生率显著更低,如严重恶心和呕吐(P < 0.01)、粘膜炎(P < 0.05)和脱发(P < 0.001)。两组中任何严重程度的心血管毒性发生率相似。虽然与CHOP相比,接受CNOP治疗的患者严重且可能危及生命的中性粒细胞减少症更频繁发生(0.05 > P > 0.10),但两组中任何严重程度的感染发生率相似。我们得出结论,CHOP和CNOP方案对先前未经治疗的侵袭性NHL患者均有效。

相似文献

1
Long-term results of a multicentre randomised, comparative phase III trial of CHOP versus CNOP regimens in patients with intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Novantrone International Study Group.CHOP方案与CNOP方案治疗中高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的多中心随机对照III期试验的长期结果。诺维本国际研究组
Eur J Cancer. 1995 Jun;31A(6):903-11. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00076-3.
2
Treatment of intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CEOP versus CNOP.使用CEOP方案与CNOP方案治疗中高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤
Eur J Haematol. 2002 Mar;68(3):135-43. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2002.01620.x.
3
Results of a randomized study of previously-untreated intermediate and high grade lymphoma using CHOP versus CNOP.一项使用CHOP方案与CNOP方案对既往未治疗的中高级别淋巴瘤进行随机研究的结果。
Ann Oncol. 1992 Mar;3(3):205-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058153.
4
Comparison of doxorubicin and mitoxantrone in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy.多柔比星与米托蒽醌在采用CHOP对比CNOP化疗方案治疗老年晚期弥漫性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的比较
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Oct;13(10):2530-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.10.2530.
5
Randomised comparison of CHOEP versus alternating hCHOP/IVEP for high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: treatment results and prognostic factor analysis in a multi-centre trial.CHOP方案与交替使用hCHOP/IVEP方案治疗高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤的随机对照研究:一项多中心试验的治疗结果及预后因素分析
Ann Oncol. 1994 Jan;5(1):49-55. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058690.
6
A randomized trial comparing intensified CNOP vs. CHOP in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Leuk Lymphoma. 2003 Apr;44(4):635-44. doi: 10.1080/1042819031000063471.
7
Randomized phase II study of biweekly CHOP and dose-escalated CHOP with prophylactic use of lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9505.侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受每两周一次CHOP方案及剂量递增CHOP方案联合预防性使用来格司亭(糖基化粒细胞集落刺激因子)的随机II期研究:日本临床肿瘤学组研究9505
Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1347-55. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf287.
8
CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial.对于侵袭性淋巴瘤老年患者,CHOP方案优于CNOP方案,而结果不受非格司亭治疗的影响:北欧淋巴瘤研究组随机试验结果
Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3840-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3238. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
9
Influence of amifostine on toxicity of CHOP in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a phase II study.氨磷汀对老年侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者CHOP方案毒性的影响——一项II期研究
Anticancer Drugs. 2002 Apr;13(4):395-403. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200204000-00008.
10
Patterns of chemotherapy administration in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.中危非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的化疗给药模式
Oncology (Williston Park). 2001 Oct;15(10):1296-306; discussion 1310-1, 1314.