Suppr超能文献

交叉与非交叉立体视觉机制之间的时间整合差异。

Temporal integration differences between crossed and uncrossed stereoscopic mechanisms.

作者信息

Patterson R, Cayko R, Short G L, Flanagan R, Moe L, Taylor E, Day P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4820, USA.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):891-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03206803.

Abstract

In this study, we investigated temporal integration of disparity information for crossed and uncrossed stereopsis. Across three experiments, exposure duration thresholds were measured for stereoscopic stimuli created from dynamic random-dot stereograms. In Experiment 1, an investigation of disparity detection showed that detection thresholds were equal for the crossed and uncrossed directions. In Experiment 2, an examination of duration limits for depth perception showed that critical durations were lower, and depth more veridical, for crossed depth than for uncrossed depth. In Experiment 3, an investigation of depth discrimination revealed that discrimination thresholds were lower for crossed depth than for uncrossed depth. These results suggest that crossed and uncrossed mechanisms differ in terms of their temporal integration properties at processing levels involving the computation and discrimination of depth.

摘要

在本研究中,我们调查了交叉视差和非交叉视差立体视觉中视差信息的时间整合情况。在三个实验中,我们测量了由动态随机点立体图创建的立体视觉刺激的暴露持续时间阈值。在实验1中,对视差检测的研究表明,交叉方向和非交叉方向的检测阈值相等。在实验2中,对深度感知持续时间限制的研究表明,交叉深度的临界持续时间更低,深度比非交叉深度更逼真。在实验3中,对深度辨别力的研究表明,交叉深度的辨别阈值低于非交叉深度。这些结果表明,交叉机制和非交叉机制在涉及深度计算和辨别的处理水平上,其时间整合特性有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验