Mundth E D
Circulation. 1976 Mar;53(3 Suppl):I176-83.
To reduce myocardial ischemia effectively, mechanical or surgical interventions must achieve either augmentation in coronary blood flow, a reduction in myocardial oxygen demand, or a combination of both. Coronary bypass graft procedures can achieve an immediate augmentation in coronary blood flow distally through the involved vessel and thereby improve myocardial perfusion and oxygen delivery and thus have the potential for reversing myocardial ischemia both acutely and for the long term. Although myocardial revascularization may resolve the ventricular functional alterations associated with acute myocardial ischemia it remains uncertain whether revascularization can reverse ischemic myocardial cellular injury and in what time framework, as related to reversible vs. irreversible ischemic cellular changes. Mechanical circulatory assistance (MCA) using diastolic counterpulsation effectively reduces myocardial ischemia by the physiologic mechanisms of 1) decrease in left ventricular after-load and left ventricular wall tension, 2) improvement is cardiac output by diastolic counterpulsation and 3) augmentation of coronary blood flow by diastolic pressure augmentation. The most effective indication for either MCA or myocardial revascularization is for interruption of myocardial ischemia prior to the development of infarction. Clinical sudies have demonstrated that acute myocardial ischemia can be effectively interrupted by intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) including reversal of left ventricular dysfunction associated with acute myocardial ischemia. In most instances, cessation of IABP resulted in recurrence of myocardial ischemia indicating the need for urgent revascularization surgery. In the management of medically refractory myocardial ischemia. IABP has been effective in complete suppression of ischemia in 80 percent and resulted in marked improvement in all, allowing safe revascularization surgery with an operative mortality in the range of 5% and perioperative myocardial infarction incidence of 2%. In patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS), IABP can resolve CS in 75 percent. The combination of IABP and surgery has resulted in survival approaching 45 percent indicative of a significant improvement in salvage in this group of patients where expected mortality approaches 100 percent.
为有效减轻心肌缺血,机械或外科干预必须实现冠状动脉血流增加、心肌需氧量降低,或两者兼而有之。冠状动脉搭桥手术可通过受累血管使远端冠状动脉血流立即增加,从而改善心肌灌注和氧输送,因此有可能在急性和长期内逆转心肌缺血。尽管心肌血运重建可能解决与急性心肌缺血相关的心室功能改变,但血运重建能否逆转缺血性心肌细胞损伤以及在何种时间框架内逆转(与可逆性和不可逆性缺血细胞变化相关)仍不确定。使用舒张期反搏的机械循环辅助(MCA)通过以下生理机制有效减轻心肌缺血:1)降低左心室后负荷和左心室壁张力;2)通过舒张期反搏改善心输出量;以及3)通过增加舒张压增加冠状动脉血流。MCA或心肌血运重建的最有效指征是在梗死发生前中断心肌缺血。临床研究表明,主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)可有效中断急性心肌缺血,包括逆转与急性心肌缺血相关的左心室功能障碍。在大多数情况下,停止IABP会导致心肌缺血复发,这表明需要紧急进行血运重建手术。在治疗药物难治性心肌缺血时,IABP在80%的患者中有效完全抑制了缺血,并使所有患者都有显著改善,从而允许进行安全的血运重建手术,手术死亡率在5%左右,围手术期心肌梗死发生率为2%。在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克(AMI-CS)患者中,IABP可使75%的患者的心源性休克得到缓解。IABP与手术相结合使生存率接近45%,这表明在预期死亡率接近100%的这组患者中,挽救率有了显著提高。