Feldt-Rasmussen U, Glinoer D, Orgiazzi J
Department of Medicine P, State University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annu Rev Med. 1993;44:323-34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.44.020193.001543.
Antithyroid drugs have mainly been used to obtain euthyroidism in patients with chronic hyperthyroidism, whatever the cause, and for long-term medical treatment of hyperthyroidism due to Graves' disease. Endocrinologists are faced with the problem of potential side effects and a high relapse rate (30-50%) after an apparently successful treatment. Despite the use of antithyroid drugs for more than four decades, controlled prospective studies have only recently been carried out, comparing high- versus low-dose antithyroid drug treatment of Graves' disease. The present review focuses on differences in treatment regimens in various areas of the world, efficiency, side effects, and the possibility of predicting relapse at the end of antithyroid drug treatment. Several surveys have recently been taken concerning treatment strategy in various parts of the world. Despite the obvious limitations of surveys carried out by a questionnaire, these studies represent the first important efforts to analyze and compare medical strategies for the management of Graves' disease in Europe, the USA, and Japan, between 1986 and 1992. There were clear indications that American thyroidologists appear to be giving up on antithyroid drug therapy more readily and opting instead for generalized ablative treatment with radioactive iodine. In Europe, on the contrary, radioiodine remains largely limited to specific conditions, and antithyroid drugs still remain the major first-line therapy for Graves' disease. In the future, immunomodulation--either alone or in combination with antithyroid drugs--might improve the medical treatment of Graves' disease. Despite the well-known limitations of antithyroid drugs, their use is simple, safe, and advantageous; European endocrinologists thus challenge the American tendency to ablate almost all patients with radioiodine.
抗甲状腺药物主要用于使慢性甲状腺功能亢进患者(无论病因如何)实现甲状腺功能正常,并用于格雷夫斯病所致甲状腺功能亢进的长期药物治疗。内分泌学家面临着潜在副作用以及在看似成功治疗后高复发率(30 - 50%)的问题。尽管抗甲状腺药物已使用了四十多年,但直到最近才开展了对照前瞻性研究,比较高剂量与低剂量抗甲状腺药物治疗格雷夫斯病的效果。本综述重点关注世界各地在治疗方案、疗效、副作用以及抗甲状腺药物治疗结束时预测复发可能性等方面的差异。最近针对世界各地的治疗策略进行了多项调查。尽管通过问卷调查进行的调查存在明显局限性,但这些研究是1986年至1992年间分析和比较欧洲、美国和日本格雷夫斯病管理医疗策略的首批重要尝试。有明确迹象表明,美国甲状腺学家似乎更倾向于放弃抗甲状腺药物治疗,转而选择用放射性碘进行全面消融治疗。相反,在欧洲,放射性碘主要仍局限于特定情况,抗甲状腺药物仍然是格雷夫斯病的主要一线治疗方法。未来,免疫调节——单独使用或与抗甲状腺药物联合使用——可能会改善格雷夫斯病的药物治疗。尽管抗甲状腺药物存在众所周知的局限性,但其使用简单、安全且具有优势;因此,欧洲内分泌学家对美国几乎对所有患者都采用放射性碘消融的倾向提出了挑战。