Mann D E, Kelly P A, Adler S W, Fuenzalida C E, Reiter M J
Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Aug;16(8):1645-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01034.x.
Radiofrequency ablation of extranodal pathways is an effective treatment for supraventricular tachycardia, but late recurrences of pathway conduction do occur. To determine if recurrence of palpitations following ablation predicts pathway recurrence, we interviewed 77 patients who were at least 4 weeks status-post successful ablation of an accessory pathway (43 overt, 11 concealed) or slow pathway (23) for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Palpitations were reported by 45 (58%) patients postablation, and 28 (36%) patients reported palpitations lasting > or = 10 seconds and/or felt their symptoms represented recurrent tachycardia (major palpitations). Repeat electrophysiological testing was performed 3 months postablation in 53 patients, including 34 patients with palpitations (22 with major symptoms). Eight (10%) patients had recurrent pathway conduction demonstrated on repeat testing: two had no symptoms prior to restudy and six had major symptoms. One patient had major symptoms, but was found to have inducible atrial tachycardia and not pathway recurrence on restudy. Thus, 15 (68%) of 22 patients with major symptoms who were restudied had no pathway recurrence or inducible arrhythmia to explain their symptoms. Of the 24 patients not restudied, none has had documented recurrent tachycardia or overt pathway conduction by electrocardiogram over a mean follow-up of 335 +/- 138 (range 132-616) days. Thus, palpitations, including palpitations reminiscent of preablation symptoms, are common following radiofrequency ablation and often do not predict pathway recurrence. Repeat electrophysiological testing is frequently required to document long-term success of radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia in patients with recurrence of major symptoms.
射频消融治疗结外旁路是室上性心动过速的一种有效治疗方法,但旁路传导确实会出现晚期复发。为了确定消融术后心悸复发是否预示着旁路复发,我们对77例患者进行了访谈,这些患者在成功消融旁路(43例显性、11例隐匿性)或房室结折返性心动过速的慢径路(23例)后至少有4周的情况。45例(58%)患者在消融术后报告有心悸,28例(36%)患者报告心悸持续≥10秒和/或感觉其症状代表复发性心动过速(严重心悸)。53例患者在消融术后3个月进行了重复电生理检查,其中包括34例有心悸的患者(22例有严重症状)。8例(10%)患者在重复检查时显示有旁路传导复发:2例在复查前无症状,6例有严重症状。1例患者有严重症状,但复查时发现有可诱发的房性心动过速而非旁路复发。因此,在复查的22例有严重症状的患者中,15例(68%)没有旁路复发或可诱发的心律失常来解释其症状。在未复查的24例患者中,在平均335±138(范围132 - 616)天的随访期间,没有心电图记录到复发性心动过速或显性旁路传导。因此,射频消融术后心悸很常见,包括让人想起消融术前症状的心悸,且通常不能预测旁路复发。对于有严重症状复发的患者,经常需要进行重复电生理检查来记录射频消融治疗室上性心动过速的长期成功率。