Rodella S, Donato F, Chiesa R, Picoco C, Fiore Donati L, Nardi G
Istituto Anatomia Patologica, Università di Verona, Italy.
Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(1):77-9. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)00419-6.
We defined some standardised criteria for classifying incident cases of liver cancer into either Primary Liver Cancer (PLC) or Unspecified Liver Cancer (ULC), on the basis of the diagnostic procedures performed. A pilot hospital-based study (98 cases) was carried out in Verona, northern Italy, in order to assess the feasibility of the method. The same protocol was subsequently applied in a population-based study (349 cases) in Bresica, northern Italy. The percentage of cases with histological verification was 38.7 and 41.8%, respectively, with a wide variation among different hospitals. The percentage of cases we attributed to the PLC category was 78.6% in the hospital-based study and 78.8% in the population-based study. No differences in the proportion of cases attributed to PLC were found according to patients' age, sex or hospital of admission. Repeatability of the method was assessed through a cross-panel review of 198 cases, with a 91.9% interobserver agreement. Implications of this method are discussed and some suggestions for cancer registration and future research are proposed.
我们根据所执行的诊断程序定义了一些标准化标准,将肝癌的发病病例分为原发性肝癌(PLC)或未明确的肝癌(ULC)。在意大利北部的维罗纳进行了一项基于医院的试点研究(98例),以评估该方法的可行性。随后,相同的方案应用于意大利北部布雷西亚的一项基于人群的研究(349例)。组织学验证病例的百分比分别为38.7%和41.8%,不同医院之间差异很大。在基于医院的研究中,我们归为PLC类别的病例百分比为78.6%,在基于人群的研究中为78.8%。根据患者的年龄、性别或入院医院,在归为PLC的病例比例上未发现差异。通过对198例病例的跨小组审查评估了该方法的可重复性,观察者间一致性为91.9%。讨论了该方法的意义,并对癌症登记和未来研究提出了一些建议。