Rohrich R J, Friedman R M, Liland D L
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9132.
Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Jan;34(1):43-7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199501000-00009.
The relative merit of cartilage scoring versus suturing in otoplasty remains a subject of debate among leading plastic surgeons. We compared a variety of otoplasty techniques in 42 rabbit ears using anterior or posterior scoring, horizontal or vertical mattress sutures, and combinations of scoring and suturing. The ears were splinted with a right-angle fold for 10 postoperative days, and the animals were killed after 8 weeks. Suturing techniques, alone or in combination with scoring, maintained an angulation significantly closer to the desired 90 degrees than anterior or posterior cartilage scoring (p < 0.05). The greatest accuracy and consistency were seen with horizontal mattress suturing, which provided an average angle (+/- SD) of 86 +/- 8.5 degrees. Histological analysis demonstrated a significant increase in cartilage hyperplasia with suturing alone, whereas the other techniques achieved only mild to moderate increases. Our findings support the usage of horizontal mattress sutures to create the antihelical fold in otoplasty.
在耳整形术中,软骨划痕法与缝合术的相对优点仍是顶尖整形外科医生争论的话题。我们在42只兔耳中比较了多种耳整形术式,包括前侧或后侧划痕法、水平或垂直褥式缝合,以及划痕法与缝合术的联合应用。术后10天用直角折叠法固定耳朵,8周后处死动物。单独使用缝合技术或与划痕法联合使用时,维持的角度明显比前侧或后侧软骨划痕法更接近理想的90度(p < 0.05)。水平褥式缝合的准确性和一致性最高,其平均角度(±标准差)为86±8.5度。组织学分析表明,单独使用缝合术时软骨增生显著增加,而其他技术仅导致轻度至中度增加。我们的研究结果支持在耳整形术中使用水平褥式缝合来形成对耳轮皱襞。