Suppr超能文献

兔模型中耳成形术技术的比较。

Comparison of otoplasty techniques in the rabbit model.

作者信息

Rohrich R J, Friedman R M, Liland D L

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9132.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Jan;34(1):43-7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199501000-00009.

Abstract

The relative merit of cartilage scoring versus suturing in otoplasty remains a subject of debate among leading plastic surgeons. We compared a variety of otoplasty techniques in 42 rabbit ears using anterior or posterior scoring, horizontal or vertical mattress sutures, and combinations of scoring and suturing. The ears were splinted with a right-angle fold for 10 postoperative days, and the animals were killed after 8 weeks. Suturing techniques, alone or in combination with scoring, maintained an angulation significantly closer to the desired 90 degrees than anterior or posterior cartilage scoring (p < 0.05). The greatest accuracy and consistency were seen with horizontal mattress suturing, which provided an average angle (+/- SD) of 86 +/- 8.5 degrees. Histological analysis demonstrated a significant increase in cartilage hyperplasia with suturing alone, whereas the other techniques achieved only mild to moderate increases. Our findings support the usage of horizontal mattress sutures to create the antihelical fold in otoplasty.

摘要

在耳整形术中,软骨划痕法与缝合术的相对优点仍是顶尖整形外科医生争论的话题。我们在42只兔耳中比较了多种耳整形术式,包括前侧或后侧划痕法、水平或垂直褥式缝合,以及划痕法与缝合术的联合应用。术后10天用直角折叠法固定耳朵,8周后处死动物。单独使用缝合技术或与划痕法联合使用时,维持的角度明显比前侧或后侧软骨划痕法更接近理想的90度(p < 0.05)。水平褥式缝合的准确性和一致性最高,其平均角度(±标准差)为86±8.5度。组织学分析表明,单独使用缝合术时软骨增生显著增加,而其他技术仅导致轻度至中度增加。我们的研究结果支持在耳整形术中使用水平褥式缝合来形成对耳轮皱襞。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验