Flicker L, Green R, Kaymakci B, Lichtenstein M, Buirski G, Wark J D
University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, Parkville, Australia.
Osteoporos Int. 1995 Jan;5(1):63-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01623660.
The interpretation of bone mineral densitometry results for a particular individual relies on valid reference data from a representative population sample. To establish local reference data, 411 Australian female volunteers had bone mineral densitometry performed at a single medical centre at the proximal femur and lumbar spine using a Hologic QDR 1000-W dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer. These data were compared with reference material from North American women compiled by Hologic. The Australian volunteers had, on average, 7% greater bone mineral density at the lumbar spine for the age range 25-55 years. Possible explanations for this include an actual population difference or the presence of a differential selection bias between the two samples.
对特定个体的骨密度测量结果进行解读,依赖于来自具有代表性人群样本的有效参考数据。为建立本地参考数据,411名澳大利亚女性志愿者在一家医疗中心使用Hologic QDR 1000-W双能X线吸收仪,对股骨近端和腰椎进行了骨密度测量。这些数据与Hologic汇编的北美女性参考资料进行了比较。在25至55岁年龄范围内,澳大利亚志愿者的腰椎骨密度平均高出7%。对此可能的解释包括实际人群差异或两个样本之间存在差异选择偏差。