Fitzgerald J M, Ramchurren N, Rieger K, Levesque P, Silverman M, Libertino J A, Summerhayes I C
Laboratory of Cancer Biology, New England Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Jan 18;87(2):129-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.2.129.
Urinary cytology has long been used as a noninvasive screen for the detection of urinary tract cancer but is limited by the generation of false positive and false negative results. More recently, molecular changes associated with urothelial neoplastic progression have been identified in DNA from urine sediments, demonstrating an alternative approach for identifying neoplastic change in the bladder.
The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the value of detection of H-ras (also known as HRAS) mutations in urine sediment DNA as a clinical indicator of tumor presence, recurrence, and/or progression.
Urine sediments were collected from 100 patients presenting with bladder tumors, with follow-up samples collected from 19 patients. DNA extracted from urine sediments was analyzed for changes in exon 1 of the H-ras gene, using single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. A representative number of aberrant H-ras/SSCP migrating bands were excised and sequenced to confirm the presence of a mutation. Human bladder specimens were obtained from patients (93 of the 100 patients initially and 18 of the 19 patients studied by follow-up) and histologically evaluated for tumor content and grade.
Mutations in exon 1 of the H-ras gene were detected in urine sediments from 44% (44 of 100) of the patients; concordant results were obtained by cytologic analysis, where 33% (31 of 93) of the patients displayed positive cytology. Analysis of the distribution of abnormalities with tumor grade revealed greater detection of low-grade (1-2) lesions using ras analysis (47%) compared with cytology (16%). In contrast, cytology was more effective in identifying the presence of carcinoma in situ. Combined results from these two approaches substantially increased the sensitivity of tumor detection, resulting in the identification of tumors in 60% of patients.
Identification of H-ras mutations in DNA from urine sediments facilitates the detection of low-grade bladder tumors and, in combination with cytology, increases the overall tumor detection from 33% to 60%. Preliminary results in patient follow-up suggest that detection of H-ras mutations may have some clinical utility in detecting the presence of abnormal cells in the absence of an overt lesion following cystoscopy or positive cytology.
尿细胞学长期以来一直被用作检测尿路癌症的非侵入性筛查方法,但受到假阳性和假阴性结果的限制。最近,在尿沉渣DNA中发现了与尿路上皮肿瘤进展相关的分子变化,这表明了一种识别膀胱肿瘤变化的替代方法。
这项前瞻性研究的目的是确定检测尿沉渣DNA中H-ras(也称为HRAS)突变作为肿瘤存在、复发和/或进展的临床指标的价值。
收集了100例膀胱肿瘤患者的尿沉渣,并从19例患者中收集了随访样本。使用单链构象多态性(SSCP)分析对从尿沉渣中提取的DNA进行H-ras基因外显子1变化的分析。切除并测序代表性数量的异常H-ras/SSCP迁移带以确认突变的存在。从患者中获取人膀胱标本(最初100例患者中的93例,随访研究的19例患者中的18例),并对肿瘤含量和分级进行组织学评估。
在100例患者中的44%(44例)的尿沉渣中检测到H-ras基因外显子1的突变;细胞学分析获得了一致的结果,其中93例患者中的33%(31例)显示细胞学阳性。对肿瘤分级异常分布的分析显示,与细胞学(16%)相比,使用ras分析检测低级别(1-2级)病变的比例更高(47%)。相比之下,细胞学在识别原位癌的存在方面更有效。这两种方法的综合结果大大提高了肿瘤检测的敏感性,在60%的患者中发现了肿瘤。
识别尿沉渣DNA中的H-ras突变有助于检测低级别膀胱肿瘤,并且与细胞学相结合,将总体肿瘤检测率从33%提高到60%。患者随访的初步结果表明,检测H-ras突变在膀胱镜检查或细胞学阳性后无明显病变的情况下检测异常细胞的存在可能具有一定的临床实用性。