Rubertsson S, Grenvik A, Wiklund L
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.
Crit Care Med. 1995 Apr;23(4):715-25. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199504000-00021.
To evaluate the blood flow and perfusion pressure differences observed during open- vs. closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including the effects of epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate administration.
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Experimental animal laboratory in a university hospital.
A total of 35 anesthetized piglets.
After tracheostomy and insertion of arterial, right atrial, and pulmonary arterial catheters, thoracotomy was performed with placement of a pulmonary arterial flow probe and left atrial catheter. Ventricular fibrillation was induced and followed by 15 mins of either open-chest (n = 14) or closed-chest (n = 21) CPR. A 4-min infusion of 50 mmol of sodium bicarbonate or saline was added at the start of CPR. After 8 mins of CPR, 0.5 mg of epinephrine was given intravenously, and after 15 mins, direct current (DC) shocks were used to revert the heart to sinus rhythm.
Blood flow was studied using transit-time ultrasound flowmetry. In an extended group, intrathoracic pressure was measured for calculation of transmural pressure. Before epinephrine administration, mean pulmonary arterial flow (cardiac output) was reduced: a) during closed-chest CPR relatively more than pulmonary perfusion pressure but in proportion to systemic perfusion pressure; b) during open-chest CPR relatively less than pulmonary perfusion pressure but still in proportion to systemic perfusion pressure. Epinephrine administration temporarily increased systemic perfusion pressure during both closed- and open-chest CPR but temporarily decreased pulmonary perfusion pressure only during closed-chest CPR. After epinephrine administration, cardiac output temporarily decreased during both closed-and open-chest CPR.
Open-chest CPR resulted in better cardiac output and systemic perfusion pressure than closed-chest CPR. However, cardiac output values obtained with both methods were much lower than previously reported. After epinephrine administration, cardiac output became extremely low with both methods.
评估开胸与闭胸心肺复苏(CPR)期间观察到的血流和灌注压差异,包括肾上腺素和碳酸氢钠给药的影响。
前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
大学医院的实验动物实验室。
总共35只麻醉仔猪。
气管切开并插入动脉、右心房和肺动脉导管后,进行开胸手术,放置肺动脉血流探头和左心房导管。诱发心室颤动,随后进行15分钟的开胸(n = 14)或闭胸(n = 21)心肺复苏。在心肺复苏开始时加入4分钟的50 mmol碳酸氢钠或生理盐水输注。心肺复苏8分钟后,静脉注射0.5 mg肾上腺素,15分钟后,使用直流电(DC)电击使心脏恢复窦性心律。
使用渡越时间超声流量计研究血流。在一个扩展组中,测量胸内压以计算跨壁压。在给予肾上腺素之前,平均肺动脉血流(心输出量)降低:a)在闭胸心肺复苏期间,相对肺动脉灌注压降低更多,但与体循环灌注压成比例;b)在开胸心肺复苏期间,相对肺动脉灌注压降低较少,但仍与体循环灌注压成比例。在闭胸和开胸心肺复苏期间,肾上腺素给药均使体循环灌注压暂时升高,但仅在闭胸心肺复苏期间使肺动脉灌注压暂时降低。给予肾上腺素后,闭胸和开胸心肺复苏期间心输出量均暂时降低。
开胸心肺复苏比闭胸心肺复苏产生更好的心输出量和体循环灌注压。然而,两种方法获得的心输出量值均远低于先前报道的值。给予肾上腺素后,两种方法的心输出量均极低。