de Peyster A, Silvers J A
Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, CA 92182, USA.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995 Apr;56(4):377-83. doi: 10.1080/15428119591017006.
This study examined the relationship between total arsenic levels in hair of employees in a semiconductor fabrication facility and job responsibility, a surrogate variable for arsenic exposure potential. Maintenance personnel who regularly worked in equipment cleaning areas were assumed to have higher potential for occupational exposure than other employees. Occipital scalp hair samples were collected from 30 maintenance personnel, supervisors, and equipment engineers with high, medium, and low potential for exposure and from 26 administrative employees. Total arsenic in hair was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy with hydride generation. Workplace air and wipe samples were analyzed to verify differing exposure potential in fabrication and administrative areas. Subjects completed written questionnaires to identify possible nonoccupational sources of arsenic. Mean hair arsenic in two of the three groups working in or near fabrication areas was slightly higher but not statistically different from that of administrative controls. Eliminating smokers, only the maintenance group regularly assigned to fabrication areas was higher than administrative controls but still not statistically different. A regression analysis of all factors indicated that sex, tapwater consumption, and dietary habits were significant contributors to arsenic in hair. Trends among these groups were consistent with expected exposure potential, although not dramatically different from controls. Main study conclusions were that (1) nonoccupational sources of arsenic can be expected to contribute more to hair levels in employees than that observed in this particular semiconductor work environment, where safe work practices were believed to be followed; and (2) monitoring should be considered in this industry to identify employees experiencing chronic, low-level arsenic exposures only if the facility also examines nonoccupational sources of exposure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究调查了一家半导体制造工厂员工头发中的总砷含量与工作职责之间的关系,工作职责是砷暴露可能性的一个替代变量。假定经常在设备清洁区域工作的维修人员比其他员工有更高的职业暴露可能性。从30名暴露可能性高、中、低的维修人员、主管和设备工程师以及26名行政员工中采集枕部头皮毛发样本。采用氢化物发生原子吸收光谱法测定头发中的总砷含量。对工作场所空气和擦拭样本进行分析,以验证制造区域和行政区域不同的暴露可能性。受试者填写书面问卷,以确定可能的非职业性砷来源。在制造区域内或附近工作的三组人员中,有两组的平均头发砷含量略高,但与行政对照组相比无统计学差异。排除吸烟者后,只有定期分配到制造区域的维修组高于行政对照组,但仍无统计学差异。对所有因素进行回归分析表明,性别、自来水消耗量和饮食习惯是头发中砷的重要影响因素。这些组之间的趋势与预期的暴露可能性一致,尽管与对照组相比差异不显著。主要研究结论为:(1)对于员工头发中的砷含量,非职业性砷来源的影响预计大于在这个被认为遵循安全工作规范的特定半导体工作环境中观察到的影响;(2)只有当工厂也检查非职业性暴露来源时,才应考虑在该行业进行监测,以识别经历慢性、低水平砷暴露的员工。(摘要截断于250字)