Erler B S, Vitagliano P, Lee S
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995 Apr;119(4):350-4.
We compared the utility of screening red blood cell (RBC) microcytosis for thalassemia minor using backpropagation neural networks, linear and quadratic discriminant functions, and previously reported discriminant functions based on RBC indices. Screening classification of cases representing possible thalassemia minor (n = 60) and non-thalassemic microcytosis (n = 60) were studied. Among eight RBC indices evaluated, the RBC count was the best univariate discriminant function. Multivariate stepwise discriminant analysis selected the RBC count, the mean corpuscular volume, and the percentage of hypochromic cells as the most discriminatory subset of RBC indices. Optimized linear and quadratic discriminant functions based on these indices performed better than seven previously reported multivariate discriminant functions. However, optimized neural networks were superior to all other discriminant methods studied, averaging 94.1% discriminant efficiency, 94.2% sensitivity, and 94.2% specificity.
我们比较了使用反向传播神经网络、线性和二次判别函数以及先前报道的基于红细胞指数的判别函数来筛查轻型地中海贫血红细胞(RBC)小红细胞症的效用。研究了代表可能轻型地中海贫血的病例(n = 60)和非地中海贫血性小红细胞症(n = 60)的筛查分类。在评估的八项红细胞指数中,红细胞计数是最佳的单变量判别函数。多变量逐步判别分析选择红细胞计数、平均红细胞体积和低色素细胞百分比作为红细胞指数中最具区分性的子集。基于这些指数的优化线性和二次判别函数比先前报道的七个多变量判别函数表现更好。然而,优化后的神经网络优于所研究的所有其他判别方法,平均判别效率为94.1%,灵敏度为94.2%,特异性为94.2%。