Marincola F M, White D E, Wise A P, Rosenberg S A
Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1110-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1110.
Here we report the long-term follow-up evaluation of a phase I/II study of toxicity and response of combination interferon alfa-2a (IFN alpha) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic cancer.
From November 1987 through October 1990, 189 patients were treated with 379 courses. IFN alpha (3 x 10(6) U/m2) was administered three times per day as an intravenous (IV) bolus with IV IL-2 2.6 x 10(6) IU/m2 (six patients, group 1), 7.8 x 10(6) IU/m2 (32 patients, group 2), or 11.7 x 10(6) IU/m2 (26 patients, group 3). Subsequently, IFN alpha dose was escalated to 6 x 10(6) U/m2 plus IL-2 11.7 x 10(6) IU/m2 (22 patients, group 4). Two further dosage schedules of IL-2 were tested at 7.8 x 10(6) IU/m2 (29 patients, group 5) and 15.6 x 10(6) IU/m2 (74 patients, group 6); however, because of IFN alpha-related toxicity, these two groups received IFN alpha once per day (6 x 10(6) U/m2). A treatment course consisted of two cycles (maximum, 15 doses per cycle) separated by a 10-day interval.
All patients were assessable for response: 82 patients had melanoma, 75 renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and 16 colorectal cancer. There were two treatment-related deaths. The objective response rate was 23% (43 patients). Response rates were 17%, 19%, 19%, 32%, 41%, and 16%, respectively, for groups 1 through 6. Ten responses are still ongoing (nine in RCC patients) at 57 to 74 months, and 21 patients are alive, for an overall 5-year survival rate of 11%. The median potential follow-up period was 65 months. Although a significantly higher response rate was noted for group 4 (highest dose of IFN alpha three times per day), no benefit for survival and increased toxicity were noted in this group.
Based on these findings, we conclude that further studies of this combination treatment are not warranted.
本文报告了一项针对转移性癌症患者的I/II期联合干扰素α-2a(IFNα)和白细胞介素-2(IL-2)毒性及反应的长期随访评估。
1987年11月至1990年10月,189例患者接受了379个疗程的治疗。IFNα(3×10⁶U/m²)每天静脉推注3次,联合静脉注射IL-2 2.6×10⁶IU/m²(6例患者,第1组)、7.8×10⁶IU/m²(32例患者,第2组)或11.7×10⁶IU/m²(26例患者,第3组)。随后,IFNα剂量增至6×10⁶U/m²加IL-2 11.7×10⁶IU/m²(22例患者,第4组)。另外还测试了两种IL-2剂量方案,分别为7.8×10⁶IU/m²(29例患者,第5组)和15.6×10⁶IU/m²(74例患者,第6组);然而,由于IFNα相关毒性,这两组患者IFNα改为每天注射1次(6×10⁶U/m²)。一个疗程包括两个周期(每个周期最多15剂),间隔10天。
所有患者均可评估反应:82例为黑色素瘤患者,75例为肾细胞癌(RCC)患者,16例为结直肠癌患者。有2例与治疗相关的死亡。客观缓解率为23%(43例患者)。第1组至第6组的缓解率分别为17%、19%、19%、32%、41%和16%。在57至74个月时,仍有10例缓解持续存在(9例为RCC患者),21例患者存活,总5年生存率为11%。中位潜在随访期为65个月。尽管第4组(IFNα最高剂量每天3次)的缓解率显著更高,但该组在生存方面无获益且毒性增加。
基于这些发现,我们得出结论,这种联合治疗无需进一步研究。